The statement means that, in times of war, people stop caring about laws. Leaders and soldiers often commit acts that society would condemn under normal circumstances. Moreover, civilians might also become less law-abiding, as they are often in desperate situations and the state is unable to persecute those who do commit a crime.
I think the statement is mostly true, as war is a state of emergency that changes how law applies. However, since World War II, the existence of international law and international tribunals have contributed to the development of laws of war, which have made this statement less true than in previous decades.
1 - Poland. 2 - Blitzkrieg. 3 - France. 4 - Puppet government.
Many people were focused only on gaining wealth and luxuries. This statement does not describe a weakness in american society in the late 1800s
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:</u>
The statement of option B does not show anything about the weakness of the society of Americans rather it shows that people were working towards gaining wealth and wanted to improve the way they spent their life by increasing their luxury.
All the other options show something about the weakness of the American society like there was depletion of natural resources or slow responses of government or only few innovations.
The main reason the South struggled to have former enslaved people being treated as equals was because they were used to them being enslaved for too long.
<h3>Why was equality hard to achieve in the South?</h3>
After the enslaved in the South became free, the Southern Whites couldn't bring themselves to view them as equals because they were once subordinated to them.
They then passed on these views to their children who were then convinced that African Americans were also beneath them as well.
Find out more on equality in the South at brainly.com/question/742718.
B. It was a defensive tactic