Answer:
The aim in writing is always to write in complete sentences which are correctly punctuated. Sentences always begin with a capital letter and end in either a full stop, exclamation or question mark. A complete sentence always contains a verb, expresses a complete idea and makes sense standing alone. A complex sentence is a sentence that contains an independent clause and one or more dependent clauses. An independent clause can stand alone as a sentence, but a dependent clause even though it has a subject and a verb cannot stand alone. Here are some examples of complex sentences.
Explanation:
Because Egypt gets little rainfall, Egyptians relied on the Nile River for water. They used its water for fishing, farming, cooking, and cleaning. The Nile River flows north from the heart of Africa to the Mediterranean Sea, about 4,000 miles. Two rivers meet to form the Nile. They are the Blue Nile in eastern Africa and the White Nile in central Africa.
Resource mobilization theory is a theory where resources are needed for a social movement to bring about change, regardless of the group's level of deprivation.
<h3>What is the resource mobilization theory?</h3>
The resource mobilization theory is a well-known model employed to understand social movements and their schools of thinking.
- This theory (resource mobilization theory) states that the success of social movements largely depends on the availability of limited resources.
In conclusion, resource mobilization theory is a theory where resources are needed for a social movement to bring about change, regardless of the group's level of deprivation.
Learn more about resource mobilization theory here:
brainly.com/question/10208627
#SPJ4
Answer:
Option B. 6%
The rule of 72 says that to find the number of years required to double your money at a given interest rate, you just divide the interest rate into 72.
72/12 = 6
Supreme Court, is the highest court in the judicial system, and it is the last court for resolving non-constitutional matters.
The Supreme Court's affirmative action in the case of Regents v. Bakke by the following:
(B) Racial quotas were not used to make admissions decisions.
<h3>The Supreme Court's affirmative action in the case of Regents v. Bakke</h3><h3 />
- The supreme court on June 18, 1978, declared affirmative action constitutional but invalidate the use of racial qoutes.
- Allan Bakke, a white man of California, filed a complaint against The medical school at the University of California, Davis.
- He applied twice to the medical school and with good marks but didnt get admission.
- Bakke said he had been subjected to unjust "race discrimination."
- In the Court, six separate opinions were issued, agreed that the university’s use of racial quotas was unconstitutional, and ordered that the medical school admit Bakke.
Thus, option (B) Racial quotas were not used to make admissions decisions is correct.
To know more about Supreme Court, visit here:
brainly.com/question/1755400
