Answer:
The correct answer is A. The Bill of Rights has, during the twentieth century gradually by incorporation, come to be accepted as national policy that applies to every level of government.
Explanation:
The Bill of Rights of the United States is the collective name given to the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution approved on December 15, 1791.
It was a response to calm the fears of anti-federalist groups, some of them influential opponents of the Constitution, and prominent members of the Philadelphia Convention, who argued that it failed to defend the basic principles of human freedom. These amendments guarantee a series of personal freedoms, limit the power of government in judicial and other proceedings; and some powers are reserved to the states and the people. Originally the modifications applied only to the federal government, however, most were subsequently applied to the government of each state through the Fourteenth Amendment through a process known as incorporation.
The British appointed William Pitt<span />
The same reason the Japanese attacked Pear Harbor.
Answer: B) Chief of State
There is no official government role such as "party chief." If a governor is serving as host at a formal ceremony, he is doing so in his official role as Chief of State.
"Chief Legislature" is not a thing. And if it were, it would not apply to the governor, because he heads the executive branch, not the legislative branch.
"Commander-in-Chief" refers to a head of state's role in charge of the military. Within a state, that would refer to the governor's role in charge of National Guard troops within a state, which he can call upon to help in a domestic crisis within that state.
<em>Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe</em> is a large oil on canvas by Édouard Manet. It shows two women, one with no clothes on and one with very few clothes, and two fully dressed men in a park. When presented for the first time, the painting was very controversial.
Viewers were shocked due to three main factors. The first one is the technique. The painting lacks depth, and the necessary shadows to make it look like it was painted outside. Moreover, the male and female figures contrast in terms of their colour, with the female figures being much brighter than the male ones.
The second reason is the lack of clothes of the women, who are casually having lunch with fully clothed men.
Finally, the gaze of the woman was also subject of debate, as it is not clear what her intention is, or what she feels towards the viewer.
