The Andes have had all of the given effects on the people except some native Indians have developed unusual physical characteristics that make it easier for them to live at high altitudes.
Option: D
Explanation:
Andes mountain a renowned fold mountain of South American continent. It is characterized by higher elevation and various relief features. Agriculture, mining both is prevalent in the surroundings of Andes mountain. Due to higher elevation terrace farming is followed. It is also rich source of minerals. The people who live there have adopted some physical features to sustain their lives over there. Andes is well connected with other neighboring states and urban area. Main indigenous people who live there are Inuits, Yupik and Aleuts.
Answer:
Basically it would be guns down type movement and would also be later known as a motorcycle ride called guns down bikes up or any movement you could do.
Explanation:
For example if I am sick and tired of guns and fighting it would be guns down peace and love :)
<span>There's not really any pros for propaganda because essentially what you are doing is lying to get someone to believe something. I guess you could say a pro is that gullible people will believe you, but that's an unethical pro. The cons are that it usually causes much controversy in a society where there's not supposed to be a bias in the government. Propaganda in its true form is never a good thing. It is unethical in the sense that it takes advantage of people who are too lazy to do research and quick to believe what someone tells them. One example I like to use is many of these independent "news" websites. On both ends of the political spectrum, left and right, you find websites that have articles so heavily weighed down with that wings propaganda that true news becomes less and less visible. Occupy Democrats is one textbook example of that. Their articles are so left leaning that you read an article and are immediately left with a left leaning impression. Same goes for a lot of right wing websites. I'm not going to say "always" but propaganda 99.9 percent of the time is not good. Instead of people doing their own research to decide their view on something, propaganda </span>tells<span> people what they should think versus the </span><span>asking </span><span>people what they think</span>
Answer:
Bandwagon
Explanation:
We've all heard Dr. Singer's case against killing animals for food. But let's face it; this is America and everyone loves a good steak. If you're invited to dinner and the host is serving meat, you're going appear outright rude if you refuse to eat what you're served. The fallacy involved here is Bandwagon
