All categories

3 years ago

The impact of corruption and fraud on an individual

Business

1 answer:

Gwar [14]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The answer is below

Explanation:

The impact of corruption and fraud on an individual is numerous, whether it is coming from a company or a state.

Usually, the impact of corruption and fraud on individuals makes such individuals have a wrong perception of the situation.

If the individual is at the wrong end of corruption and fraud, such individual would miss many opportunities, including access to employment, good health care systems, be exposed to the inefficient quality of standard of living, and many more. Hence, such an individual would believe that little to nothing works in his immediate environment.

In the same vein, if such an individual is gaining from fraud and corruption, he would believe the situations are right for him, and that it is perfectly normal to cheat, lie, and bribe his way through to success. Hence, such an individual would see the world as the best fraudster or most corrupt rules the world and it would be a normal thing to him.

You might be interested in

Tommy is able to depreciate the value of machinery as part of his income tax return. If he has a tractor valued at $50,000 that

Rom4ik [11]

Answer:$26,386.60

Explanation: According to the question above, Tommy is able to depreciate his tractor valued at $50,000 with depreciation rate of 12% per year.

Cost is $50,000

depreciation rate is 12% per annum

First year= 50,[email protected]% = 50,000-6000= 44,000

Second year = 44,[email protected]% = 44,000-5280=38,720

Third year = 38,720 @ 12% = 38,720 - 4646.40 = 34,073.60

Forth year = 34,073.60 @ 12% = 34,073.60-4088.83 =29,984.77

Fifth year= 29,984.77 @12%= 29984.77 - 3,598.17=26,386.60

The value of the Tractor in five years is $26,386.60

6 0

3 years ago

Helena is given a voucher that can be spent only on educational expenses. She has a budget constraint with educational expenses

ss7ja [257]

Answer: Helena will most likely end up spending some more money on everything else after receiving the voucher.

Explanation:

The budget constraint is used to shows the combinations of two goods which can be afforded by a consumer. A normal good is a good or product that when the income of the person rises,the demand for the product will also increase.

Based on the above information on the question, the correct answer is "Helena will most likely end up spending some more money on everything else after receiving the voucher".

This is because the voucher she was given can be spent only on educational expenses and her budget constraints comprises of educational expenses and everything else which is made up of normal goods. This means she'll still needs to get the normal goods later.

5 0

3 years ago

Which sentence contains an error?

Marta_Voda [28]

a, since twenty-seven should say 27 or twenty seven without a dash

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Two characteristics of sociological minorities are _____ and _____.

inysia [295]

The answer is D. Physical or cultural difference; subordination.

5 0

3 years ago

Why planning is considered as a road<br> map towards the destination?

IRINA_888 [86]

Answer: Because planning allows you to draw a guide on how to do things.

Explanation: The planning is order and when there is order there will always be better results. If a person has a goal and it is planned, it is more likely that she will get what she wants since she has traced a path, she has created a way of how to do it.

Planning helps you know what to take into account and what not. It allows you to focus on the important details and put aside things that can only serve as a distraction.

3 0

3 years ago

The impact of corruption and fraud on an individual​

The impact of corruption and fraud on an individual