1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
trasher [3.6K]
3 years ago
14

What led to the rapid rise in the population and what were the consequences of that growth? Be specific and of course, give deta

ils.
this is for history and the teacher is a tough grader
History
1 answer:
mojhsa [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

This rapid growth increase was mainly caused by a decreasing death rate (more rapidly than birth rate), and particularly an increase in average human age. By 2000 the population counted 6 billion heads, however, population growth (doubling time) started to decline after 1965 because of decreasing birth rates.

Explanation:Rapid growth has led to uncontrolled urbanization, which has produced overcrowding, destitution, crime, pollution, and political turmoil. Rapid growth has outstripped increases in food production, and population pressure has led to the overuse of arable land and its destruction.

You might be interested in
Which of the following best describes how the articles of confederation divide government power?
adelina 88 [10]

Answer:

what are they

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What is the Electoral College?
grandymaker [24]
A. The way we elect the President of the United states
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do questions about being a polygamist or an anarchist seem out of place?
Bess [88]

Polygamy is having more than one wife or husband at once, and anarchism is the rejection of the state or any other type of authority when organizing human societies.

Both types of behaviour are frowned upon by our society, to the point that they can be considered taboo. A taboo is an implicit (although sometimes it can be explicit, like through the enactment of a law) prohibition of something, because it is believed that the act goes against the agreed cultural or religious beliefs of a community. Establishing those kind of limits helps communities to be more organized and to have a stronger sense of "belonging." On the other hand, it can isolate those who think differently and cause the community to be closed to new ideas.

7 0
2 years ago
Why do you think the Jews were blamed for the Bubonic plague? What was the real cause?
Leviafan [203]

As a Jew myself, I had heard (not knowing for sure if it’s factual) that Jews who ate Kosher food did not get the Bubonic plague. Presumably, this was due to the fact that pork carried the virus of this particular plague. It also might have accounted for the fact that non-Jews were suspicious of why the Jews were not as affected.

4 0
3 years ago
I really need help or I’m gonna fail this class.
muminat
You need your book to answer the questions
7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did large numbers of immigrants came to the us between 1870 and 1914?
    13·1 answer
  • What is the basis for president Kennedy's demand that the missiles be removed from Cuba?
    15·1 answer
  • The results of the French and Indian War
    7·1 answer
  • What relationships are among the five relationships spoken of in confucius philosphy
    7·1 answer
  • these puppies were BORN in the same litter to the same parents. but they have DIFFERENT traits for the feature of toenail
    11·1 answer
  • How would civil order be transformed if each person always followed his or her conscience?
    9·1 answer
  • What caused the US Army to take over atomic research in the early 1940s?
    6·2 answers
  • Which best describes Henry Clay’s American System?
    13·1 answer
  • Did Ottoman Empire take taxes from United States? ​
    9·1 answer
  • During the years of the Industrial Revolution
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!