The answer would be that the tone is peaceful because it sounded like the lady gave him something and that's why he's saying thank you. It's not really joyful and the boy didn't do crazy things so that eliminates suspensful and joyful. The reason I didn't choose angry and violent is because even thought she shut the door, she didn't slam the door. So Peaceful is the answer
Jean might see that people in China look different and there is different cultural exercises. I think it would be the same if someone were to go from France to China, but there is more diversity among the world, so we could see people from China, Asia, Africa, Mexico and more. So its more common.
And they might call Jean a foreign devil because they are going to another country and leaving their own country.
His point of view is thinking of Jean as a traitor for leaving his country, but Jean might just be trying to learn form others and explore.
Hope this helps!!
Answer:
I'm pretty sure the punctuation error is in the third sentence;
<em>'This struggle plays out chiefly through the protagonist; Charlie, who anchors the film brilliantly.'</em>
Just after the word 'protagonist', the author uses a semi-colon (;). A semi-colon is used to link two separate clauses that have similar ideas together. It turns two clauses into one.
In this situation, the semi-colon is not doing that, because that would imply that if we were to separate the "two clauses", it would look like this:
<em>"This struggle plays out chiefly through the protagonist. Charlie, who anchors the film brilliantly." </em>
This wouldn't make sense. Instead of a semi-colon, the author should've used a comma!
The subject-verb agreement rule which is being broken in the sentence above is c<span>ollective subjects functioning as a unit require singular verbs.
The collective subject <em>the crew </em>requires a singular verb, because it denotes a single unit. So, instead of using the verb <em>have visited, </em>it should have been <em>has visited. </em></span>