Answer:
Infant-industry argument
Explanation:
Infant-industry argument says that a particular industry can't compete with other international competitors because of the economies of scale. So, they demand a temporary protection until they gain economies of scale to be ready to compete on a level playing field.
Note: This can also come in the category of 'unfair competition' argument as huge economies of scales of well established companies create an unfair environment for nascent industries to compete on a same level.
Answer:
The correct answers are $40,000 and $13,500
Explanation:
The implicit cost of the business is $40,000 nothing for the entrepreneur's time plus $13,500 nothing for the entrepreneur's funds (enter your response as an integer)
The implicit cost indicates the cost of an asset rather than selling it or renting it out. In other words, the company has to give up by deciding not to exploit an asset. For this case $40,000
For the other line
15% = 0.15
$90,000 x 15% = $13,500
Answer:
Subliminal stimuli
Explanation:
Subliminal stimuli is defined as a stimulus that is below the sensory capacity of an individual. It is below the threshold where the individual can perceive that there is a change in something. For example if a company is producing potato chips and they want to increase salt content.
The point at which the consumer starts to notice a change in salt content of the potatoe chips is above the subliminal stimuli.
Although subliminal stimuli is not readily perceived it can unconciously influence consumer behaviour.
False
Reason: A Shareholder cannot go for the director's by writing his name on the proxy Statement. Instead he has to place his name on the AGM or Annual General Meeting, where Shareholders meet, propose for their plans and Vote for The Company's Director.
Answer:
Option D) $54.400
Explanation:
When a company disposes a capital asset, the cost of the asset it's the remanent value, that is the difference between the original cost less the accumulated depreciation, in this case $170.000 minus $109.000, remanent value is $61.000.
This value it's the cost of sale and the price it's $50.000 , the result of this transaction it's a loss of ($11.000) so the after-tax cash inflow it's ($4.400).
The total Cash Inflow it's the sum of $50.000 (gained from the sale) and the save on taxes for $4.400, because of the loss I get a payback on taxes, the total is $54.400.
