Rule I is correct.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Year Cash flow Pv at 8% Discounted cash flow
0 100000 1 100000
1 26000 0.9259 24074.074
2 26000 0.8573 22290.809
3 26000 0.7938 20639.638
4 26000 0.7350 19110.776
5 26000 0.6806 17695.163
From the above calculation, the net present value is $203810.46
Option 1 Option 2
NPV 203810.5 200000
Payback 5 years 0 years
IRR No IRR No IRR
NPV (Net present value) option say that former would be selected
So, answer is Rule I only.
Answer:
see below
Explanation:
Banks pay interest on customer deposits. It means that a customer's deposit will grow if left at the banks for some period. When a customer deposits, the bank retains only a small fraction of the money in its custody. The bigger portion is loaned out to other customers. Therefore, a bank uses customer deposits to create loans. In return, the banks will pay customers interest for the use of their deposits. Banks also charge interest when they loan out money.
Explanation:
hope I'll help you mark me as brainliest
Answer:
c. No; the facts of this situation do not provide reasonable grounds for a stop and search. Any attempt to do so by store security could result in a claim of false imprisonment.
Explanation:
According to the situation described in the question above, store security has no right to stop and search for Jeff. Therefore, the letter c is the most correct answer to this question.
Jeff's actions in the store do not provide sufficient reasons for there to be any kind of stop and research, as the facts in the situation do not provide enough information about an illegal act, so if store security forces a situation there could be legal damage to the store .
Therefore, it is essential that stores adopt a theft prevention strategy, with an effective security system and a team prepared to carry out correct approaches.
