Answer:
Your rebuttal should be arguing against the counterclaim, not for it.
Explanation:
Answer:
- Question of value.
Explanation:
As per the question, Megan employs a 'question of value' kind of persuasive speech that is inclined towards arguing a specific value to be ethical or unethical, moral or immoral, and determining conclusions accordingly. Such a speech proposes an ethical appeal in order to evoke a judgmental reaction or response from the audience like Megan argues that 'providing similar rights or privileges regardless of the gender, race, sex, etc.' aims to reflect the righteousness of immorality associated with the issue. This ethical argument leads to elicit a morally judgmental response from the audience. Therefore, it exemplifies <u>'question of value'.</u>
I think it refers to pride or power
So what do you need help with
