1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bezzdna [24]
3 years ago
7

Jeanie wrote the expanded form of (0.2) superscript 5 below. 0.2 + 0.2 + 0.2 + 0.2 + 0.2 Which statement is true? Jeanie wrote t

he expanded form correctly. Jeanie should have used only four factors of 0.2 as the base. Jeanie should have multiplied the base by itself five times. Jeanie should have multiplied 0.2 by 5.
Mathematics
2 answers:
Artemon [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

jeanie should have multiplied

Step-by-step explanation:

edge 2021

Leokris [45]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Jeanie should have multiplied the base by itself five times.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

(0.2) superscript 5

= 0.2 + 0.2 + 0.2 + 0.2 + 0.2

= 0.2 × 5

= 1

The above solution is wrong

The correct solution is:

(0.2) superscript 5

= 0.2^5

= 0.2 × 0.2 × 0.2 × 0.2 × 0.2

= 0.00032

The true statement is:

Jeanie should have multiplied the base by itself five times.

The base is 0.2 multiplied by itself 5 times

You might be interested in
The opposite angles of a rhombus are equal true or flase?
Scrat [10]
I believe the answer is True
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which expression best represents the sum of two consecutive integers?
xxMikexx [17]
<span>x + (x + 1)
.............
</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Substitute 10 for z in z -5 &lt; 7
EleoNora [17]
Then it would be 10-5 < 7
so if you solved it it would be 5 < 7
So this statement is true
4 0
3 years ago
Noah said, “When you divide a number by a second number, the result will always be smaller than the first number.”
marshall27 [118]

Answer:

When dividing two fractions by each other, the result will be larger. Dividing two whole numbers, however, will always result in a smaller number because you're taking away a part of the number.

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Help plz...............
Charra [1.4K]

Step-by-step explanation:

2πr

2x 3.14 x 8.1 = 50.22in

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Jenna's parents have given her an running shoes. interest-free loan of $100 to buy a new pair of She plans to pay back the loan
    8·1 answer
  • Help please i’ll give brainliest
    12·1 answer
  • The function f(x) = −x2 − 7x + 30 shows the relationship between the vertical distance of a diver from a pool's surface f(x), in
    11·2 answers
  • Find the difference 6x^2-14x+4/x(x-2) - 6x-1/x+1
    5·2 answers
  • What is the answer to 2x^3(5x-1)
    14·1 answer
  • Help me !! With number 3! I’ll mark you brainly
    8·1 answer
  • What is the exponential regression equation that fits these data? y x 1 4 2 8 3 27 4 85 5 250 6 600
    9·1 answer
  • A woodworker wants to cut a board that is 10.016 feet long into 4 equal-length pieces. How long will each of the cut boards be?
    14·2 answers
  • How do you calculate the mean I (I will Bralnllest;)
    8·2 answers
  • Solve the compound inequality for x:<br> 2 &lt; 3x - 5 &lt; 4
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!