Answer:
B. England became a democracy.
C. C. He was tried and executed under the law
Explanation:
Price Charles (1600-1649) was the king ruling England, Scotland and Ireland since 1625 to 1649. He was a very aggressive king who believes because he was a king that his decisions are final and no one could question his conscience.
The above looks to be the most significant on the death of Prince Charles during the period of 1649. During this period, the Monarchy form of government was abolished and replaced with democracy pending when Prince Charles's son take over in 1660.
The other point is that it became the first time a King was tried and executed under the law through the parliament.
Well, Louis Pasteur was a scientist who discovered a process called "pasteurization." What this process is is heating food or whatever liquids to kill the bacteria which might be in it. This process became widely used for milk, as well as for vaccines. It improved food safety for the public and provided for a way that people can get vaccinated so that their immune systems are resistant to disease. So from my knowledge, I would say "<span>better standards for public health" is your answer.
</span>
Reagan was often called the "Teflon President, " because criticism and blame never seemed to stick to him.
<span>to make sure the Union Army could not use Confederate resources</span>
Answer:
<h2>direct democracy</h2><h2>Issues and controversies</h2><h2>Discussions on direct-democratic institutions deal with several issues. The strongest normative grounds for direct democracy are the democratic principles of popular sovereignty, political equality, and all the arguments for participative democracy that support the idea that all citizens should have the right not only to elect representatives but also to vote on policy issues in referenda. Since assembly democracy cannot be an option in modern societies (outside Switzerland), direct-democratic institutions are regarded not as a full-scale alternative to representative democracy but as a supplement to or counterweight within democratic systems with major representative features. Nevertheless, the institutional difference and competition between representative and direct-democratic processes lie at the core of the controversy whether direct democracy contributes to undermining representative democracy or can offer enrichments of democracy.</h2>
<h3>Explanation:</h3>
<h3>correct me if I'm wrong</h3><h3>please brainless my answer</h3>
