In both cases, it is considered plagiarism.
- when the post written for the client on the platform will be published on its own blog.
- when a post written for a client resell to another client.
<h3>What is Plagiarism?</h3>
Plagiarism refers to the act when any individual copied the content of another author or writer as presented as their own work without taking permission from them.
In both, the cases consent from the client has not been taken which shows the case of theft, as after giving content to the client it belongs to them only. So both the cases are considered plagiarism.
Learn more about Plagiarism, here:
brainly.com/question/27960172
#SPJ1
Answer:
the reader gets to know the thoughts of that one character the 1st person POV is in esp bc 1st person POV is narrated with "I" or "we". what they're thinking, how they feel, what they're doing, etc. but what is hidden from the reader is the thoughts/feelings/actions of the other characters.
Explanation:
for example if you're reading a chapter or book that's only narrated in 1st person POV like from the main character, then you're going to get to know that main character the most. everyone else you don't know as well because you're not reading in their POV instead.
Hello. You did not inform the article to which this text refers, which makes it impossible for your question to be answered. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
To support the idea that a storm was the worst sight in all of America, the author must present information to support this argument. Therefore, the author must have shown meteorological data that show the intensity of the storm and compare it with other storms. In addition, the author must show the destructive power of the storm, presenting the damage it caused to the American population.
A. ababcb I think I'm not sure tho
