The emissions per capita measurement is a better because it shows the number of people divided by the emissions.
<h3>What is the difference between total emissions and emissions per capita?</h3>
The emissions per capita show the emissions per each citizen or inhabitant, while the total emissions show only the emissions of the country.
<h3>Which one is better?</h3>
The per capita gauge is better because whether a country is polluting more or not depends on how much each citizen pollutes. This information is useful to create laws that reduce pollution.
Learn more about pollution in: brainly.com/question/23857736
#SPJ1
Answer:
yes 1.6 is a solution i got u ur welcom
Aww(: well Mitt Romney is a republican candidate
Formula for Perimeter of Rectangle:
P = 2(L + W)
Plug in 160:
160 = 2(L + W)
L = 4W
So we can plug in '4W' for 'L' in the first equation.
<span>160 = 2(L + W)
160 = 2(4W + W)
Combine like terms:
160 = 2(5W)
160 = 10W
Divide 10 to both sides:
W = 16
Now we can plug this back into any of the two equations to find the length.
L = 4W
L = 4(16)
L = 64
So the width is 16, and the length is 64.</span>
Answer:
The diagonals are not congruent should be the answer...
Step-by-step explanation:
Might wanna get another opinion but im pretty sure im right.