However the standard image of southern slavery is that large plantation with hundreds pf slaves. in fact such situations were rare. fully 3/4 of southern whites did not even own slaves; those who did was 88% owned twenty or fewer.
Don't then they may be not avaliable to have an absolute rule.
This is in my opinion one of the aspects that makes the central courts and the different lines of thought within a single subject so interesting. The clash of ideas that we have in this case is a perfect example.
- On one side we have those who look at the current 30 million uninsured Americans, which include millions in Texas, and the undeniable success it had in Massachusetts. Most of them conclude that this mandate is a government success.
- On the other hand, we can find those who believe that this is a terrible invasion of the government to the citizen's free will to choose their own healthcare options, they see government overreach, and at the same time an unprecedented intrusion on individual liberties to which there is no justification.
Unfortunately this is something that millions of Americans have been forced into. It's evident how they refused to create a public health care system, and instead give more power to the private sector.
After this short debate of ideas, I will give you one question to ponder on: Which principle is more important? Your freedom, your civil liberties, and your freedom from the government line of thought, or the possibilty of providing health care to millions of uninsured Americans?
I hope this solves your question!
Happy 2019! :)
When Karl Marx stated that religion was the <u>opiate </u><u />of the <u>masses </u><u />, he was referring to the way that religion kept workers <u>obedient</u><u /> by promising happiness in the <u>afterlife</u>.
Karl Marx felt very strong about organized religion. He felt that that religion was used as a tool to keep citizens obedient. Organized religion would help ensure that no citizen would question the society they live in. Marx considered religion as a technique by powerful officials to keep normal citizens clueless as to what is going on in a society.
