I'm thinking this is what the problem looks like:
. The first thing to do is to move the
over to the other side because it has a common denominator with the other side. Doing that and at the same time combining them over their common denominator looks like this:
. The best way to solve for x now is to cross-multiply to get 3(4-x)=-4(x-4). Distributing through the parenthesis is 12 - 3x = -4x + 16. Solving for x gives us x = 4. Of course when we sub a 4 back in for x we get real problems, don't we? Dividing by zero breaks every rule in math that there ever was! So, yes, the solution is extraneous.
Wait when x= 2 or -4? is the second part options or 5(x-2)/(x-2)(x+4)
Answer:
- B. BC = 18 so ∆ABC ~ ∆DEF by SAS
Step-by-step explanation:
So, ∆ABC ~ ∆DEF by SAS.
<h3>
<u>------------------------------------</u></h3>
Answer: the others are 5cm and 8cm
Step-by-step explanation:
this is because a rhombus is the same as a rectangle or square and they have equal two sides