Answer:
The appropriate solution is "$130,000".
Explanation:
The given values are:
No. of common shares outstanding
= 50,000
Dividend per share
= $1.80
No. of preferred shares outstanding
= 8,000
Dividend per share
= $5
Now,
The total dividend on common shares will be:
= 
On substituting the values, we get
= 
= 
($)
The total dividend on preferred stock will be:
= 
On substituting the values, we get
= 
= 
($)
Hence,
The total dividend paid by company will be:
= 
= 
= 
($)
Thus the above is the correct answer.
Alice is willing to spend $30 on a pair of jeans, and has a coupon for $10 off she found online. She selects and purchases a $35 pair of jeans, pre-discount.
(Alice's consumer surplus, $5)
<span>Jeff finds some steaks for $16 for which he would have been willing to pay $20. The butcher notices the meat is near the expiration date and gives him an extra 75% off. </span>
(Jeff's consumer surplus, $16)
<span>Nicole has in her possession a hockey puck from the 2010 Winter Olympic Games and sells it on eBay. She will only sell the puck if the winning bid is greater than or equal to $500. After bidding closes, the last bid stands at $500. </span>
(Nicole's producer surplus, $0)
<span>Claire is trying to sell her used calculus textbook online. She asks for $150 or best offer and is willing to sell for anything over $100. She is able to sell it for $125. </span>
(Claire's producer surplus, $25)
<span>Roy is willing to pay $2.50 for a sports drink. He notices the price is $2.79 and chooses not to purchase a sports drink. (Roy's consumer surplus, $0)</span>
Price ceiling are measure employed by government to help the consumers by mandating a maximum price that the seller must charge for a product or service.
- The measure of imposing price in market are rare but are notably used during natural disasters.
- Price ceiling helps to prevent the producers from exploiting the consumers.
In conclusion, the major disadvantage of price ceiling is that when a price ceiling is set below the equilibrium price, the quantity demanded will exceed quantity supplied, thus, this will result to excess demand of goods and shortage in the market.
Learn more about Price ceiling here
<em>brainly.com/question/8868002</em>
The span of time is 9 months.
Answer:
What would be the result? What additional information, if any, would you need to know to decide the case?
To determine who would win this case, we need to know two things:
- The non-compete agreement was supposed to last how many years, e.g. 1 or 2 years, maybe 3?
- When did Clifford Witter stopped working for Arthur Murray Dance Studios and when did he started to work for Fred Astaire Dancing Studios?
Most states consider non-compete agreements valid only if they last up to 2 or 3 years at most (which is considered a reasonable time). If Clifford started to work at Fred Astaire before the non-compete clause was over (assuming it lasted a reasonable time) then Arthur Murray would win. But if Clifford started to work at Fred Astaire after the non-compete clause was over, then there is nothing Arthur Murray can do to win the case.
