This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Read Father’s Help
By: R. K Narayan
if you were swami , what would you have done? would you have told the truth to your father,given the letter to the headmaster or tried to provoke samuel as swami did?
Answer:
Swami only described Samuel as a violent teacher toward his students to get out of going to school. Considering that he lied, despite his le having some truth behind it, the right thing to do would have been being honest about not wanting to go to school, and probably accepting that he would have to go anyway.
Explanation:
However, telling the truth to his father should also include letting him know about Samuel´s bad behavior. Despite maybe not being as bad as Swami said, no violence, to any degree, should be accepted in school, or anywhere to that matter. And considering the father´s actions in the story, we can assume he would have done something about it when the headmaster return.
Answer:
He is still willing to assist others.
Explanation:
hope this helps :)))
The answer is B. Slavery ended long before that point, Martin Luther King Jr. spoke up about segregation. So A doesn’t make sense. C doesn’t make sense because MLK didn’t think things were going well, he spoke up because things WERENT going well. D doesn’t make sense either.
Rebecca Saxe and her colleagues conducted an experiment on morals and social habits. The most important conclusions are the following:
- When people gather in large groups, there is a possibility that both good and bad things may happen. Although a group may have good intentions (on social, political, or other aspects), there is always a possibility that this group may harm those outside the group.
- Saxe states that a person individually can express a certain morality and values but, when being in a group, those could be set aside. The individual could even end up doing things that contradict what he/she personally thinks. This can be explained because in this group, the individual experiences anonymity and feels no need to take responsibility for the group’s actions.
- The hypothesis of the research argues that when an individual enters a group, they can be ignore their individual and moral beliefs, being prone to participate in activities that they might consider arguable if they were not part of it.
