Technically speaking, it won't be wrong for you to accept the gifts.
You never giving any of your employees gifts show that you gave no 'special favor' to specific employees. It's a matter of ethical belief and your personal action
But you can't control other people's ethical belief, just like you can't control other people action's
Answer:
Follows are the solution to this question:
Explanation:
In option A, Its increase in consumption and GDP is $200.
In option B, Investment decisions increase about $1800, net exports drop by $1800 and therefore GDP should remain constant.
In option C, GDP or investment wasn’t increasing only at present because estimates were produced last year.
In option D, Market growth is $470 million, options trading is rising by $30 million but GDP is growing by $500 million.
GDP is just a misleading indicator, it does not take into account recreation, environmental protection, education and health rates, non-market behaviors, changes in wealth disparity, increases of variety or rises in innovation. HDI's social progress Index could be used to highlight a need for people or their ability to assess national growth as the supreme requirement.
Answer:
$4,750
Explanation:
The computation of the depreciation expense is shown below:
= (Original cost - residual value) ÷ (useful life)
where,
Original cost = $18,000 + $500 + $2,500 = $21,000
And, the other items would remain same
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would be equal to
= ($21,000 - $2,000) ÷ (4 years)
= ($19,000) ÷ (4 years)
= $4,750
Answer:
b. $4,908,000
Explanation:
According to the FASB GAAP, the straight line method is used in this given question which is shown below:
= (Original cost - residual value) ÷ (useful life)
= ($40,900,000 - $4,090,000) ÷ (15 years)
= ($36,810,000) ÷ (15 years)
= $2,454,000
In this method, the depreciation is same for all the remaining useful life
For two years, the accumulated depreciation would be
= Annual year depreciation × number of years
= $2,454,000 × 2 years
= $4,908,000
Answer:
B. consensus; distinctiveness; consistency.
Explanation:
Internal attribution: It is the case of human behavior that causes the attribution, such as ability, skills, personality, etc. it is also known as dispositional attribution. In this case, individual does not blame external factor or attribution, instead, they use an internal cause for their behavior.
In the given case, the employee comes late to the office, he will use internal attribution for his behavior if there is low consensus, low distinctiveness of other factors and high consistency of getting late.
