The measure of systematic risk is called <u>beta</u>.
The answer is option c.
Beta is the same old CAPM measure of systematic hazard. It gauges the tendency of the go back of protection to transport in parallel with the return of the inventory market as an entire. One manner to consider beta is as a gauge of a protection's volatility relative to the marketplace's volatility.
Systematic risk is a part of the total risk this is caused by factors beyond the control of a specific company or individual. Systematic risk is caused by elements that are outside to the organization. All investments or securities are situations to systematic hazard and, therefore, it's far a non-diversifiable chance.
To measure a monetary firm's contribution to systemic hazard includes measuring the company's expected capital shortfall in a crisis. This right away offers the regulator with a quantifiable degree of the relative significance of a firm's contribution to ordinary systemic chance.
Learn more about organization here: brainly.com/question/24448358
#SPJ4
Answer:
0.95
Explanation:
Given that,
Market demand for wheat: Q = 100 − 2p + 1pb + 2Y
price of wheat, p = $2
price of barley, pb = $3
Income, Y = $1000
Q = 100 − 2p + 1pb + 2Y
= 100 - (2 × 2) + (1 × 3) + (2 × 1,000)
= 100 - 4 + 3 + 2,000
= 2,099
Differentiating Q with respect to Y,
dQ/dY = 2
Income elasticity of wheat:
= (dQ/dY) × (Y ÷ Q)
= 2 × (1,000 ÷ 2,099)
= 0.95
Marginal productivity theory assumes that a worker’s income is a function of the contribution of that worker to the value of the output. in business, this is called the "value-added" approach.
There is a correct theory called marginal productivity theory. Wages are paid at a level equal to the marginal revenue product of labor, the MRP (value of the marginal product of labor). MRP is the increase in income caused by the increase in output produced by the last employed worker.
The marginal productivity theory of income distribution proposes that each individual should receive income based on their contribution to total output. The marginal productivity theory of income distribution has been criticized for the following reasons. Income from inheritance is inconsistent with the theory.
Learn more about Marginal revenue here: brainly.com/question/13617399
#SPJ4
Answer:
Economic growth generates job opportunities and hence stronger demand for labour, the main and often the sole asset of the poor. In turn, increasing employment has been crucial in delivering higher growth.
Answer:
e. $638
Explanation:
payment to be made as per forward contract (IN $)
= 39960/ 1.682
= $23757.43
now the actual rate after 90 days is 1.638
payment at 1.638 rate = 39960/ 1.638
= $24395.6
loss by hedging = $24395.6 - $23757.43
= $638.17
Therefore, The U.S. firm have saved or lost $638 in U.S. dollars by hedging its exchange rate exposure.
