1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ira [324]
3 years ago
5

Why do you think Pres.

History
1 answer:
lina2011 [118]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

President McKinley Explains His Attitude toward the Philippines, 1900

In an interview President William McKinley (1843-1901) told how he came to accept the acquisition of the Philippines.

Hold a moment longer! Not quite yet, gentlemen! Before you go I would like to say just a word about the Philippine business. I have been criticised a good deal about the Philippines, but don't deserve it. The truth is I didn't want the Philippines, and when they came to us, as a gift from the gods; I did not know what to do with them. When the Spanish war broke out Dewey was at Hongkong, and I ordered him to go to Manila and to capture or destroy the Spanish fleet, and he had to; because, if defeated, he had no place to refit on that side of the globe, and if the Dons were victorious they would likely cross the Pacific and ravage our Oregon and California coasts. And so he had to destroy the Spanish Fleet, and did it! But that was as far as I thought then.

When next I realized that the Philippines had dropped into our laps I confess I did not know what to do with them. I sought counsel from all sides - Democrats as well as Republicans - but, got little help. I thought first we would take only Manila; then Luzon; then other islands perhaps also. I walked the door of the White House night after night until midnight: and I am not ashamed to tell you, gentlemen, that I went down on my knees and prayed Almighty God for light and guidance more than one night. And one night late it came to me this way - I don't know how it was, but it came: (1) That we could not give them back to Spain - that would be cowardly and dishonorable; (2) that we could not turn them over to France or Germany - our commercial rivals in the Orient - that would be bad business and discreditable; (3) that we could not leave them to themselves - they were unfit for self-government - and they would soon have anarchy and misrule over there worse than Spain's was; and (4) that there was nothing left for us to do but to take them all, and to educate the Filipinos, and uplift and civilize and Christianize them, and by God's grace do the very best we could by them, as our fellow-men for whom Christ also died. And then I went to bed, and went to sleep, and slept soundly, and the next morning I sent for the chief engineer of the War Department (our mapmaker), and I told him to put the Philippines on the map of the United States [pointing to a large map on the wall of his office], and there they are, and there they will stay while I am President!

You might be interested in
By the rule of James II conflicts between English monarchs and Parliament had worsened so much that Parliament’s solution was to
Lelu [443]
The answer is either a or b. by dissolving the monarchy they would get a new type of ruling
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does douglass portray the effects of slavery on masters and slaves?
tamaranim1 [39]

Douglass portrays the slave traders and agents for slave traders as men auctioning for cattle instead of human beings. The slave traders and agents for slave traders at no point stop to think what they are doing is wrong, instead, it is business as usual and they are eager to acquire misbehaved slaves at steep discounts, much the same as farmers will bid pennies on the dollar for underweight farm animals.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the positive effects of getting this territory? [Hint(s): California]
Sladkaya [172]

The positive effects of getting California is that it's closer to Asia, and California side of the nation at the time could have open territory to conquer.

4 0
3 years ago
How did rutherford contribute to the atomic theory?
stira [4]
Ernest Rutherford contributed to the atomic theory by discovering that the atom is mostly empty space.

He can to that conclusion because he fired alpha particles at gold foil, which was so thin that it was only around .00004 cm thick, and while almost all shot straight through, some actually bounced back!

He likened it to shooting a 15-inch round(bullet) at tissue paper, only to have it bounce right back at you! Based on this, he theorized that the atom is mostly empty, which is why a majority of the particles passed right through, but in the very center of the atom there is a super-dense structure called a nucleus that held a majority of the atom's mass. This super-dense mass would be more than massive enough to deflect the particle, should they collide.
4 0
3 years ago
Because of the activities of people like Klaus Fuchs, Harry Gold, and David Greenglass, the 1940s and 1950s can be called
sveta [45]

Answer:

the age of espionage

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • WHO WAS ANNE FRANK<br> AND HOW WAS SHE AFFECTED BY THE NAZI'S
    9·2 answers
  • What was the purpose of the american colonization society
    14·1 answer
  • Who can declare war?
    7·1 answer
  • What is the long term effect of tariffs and other trade barriers ?
    9·2 answers
  • The_________ part of the roman emp. became known as the byzantine emp.
    12·1 answer
  • How did the north ordinance of the 1787 reflect Thomas Jefferson’s ideas
    7·1 answer
  • Describe your feelings about country 'India'.
    8·2 answers
  • Best characteristic of Japan in the early 1940
    5·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST (NOT AS BIG AS IT SEEMS) PLEASE HELP
    15·1 answer
  • What reputation did Emma as Charles Mayberry have in Louisville?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!