All three sides always add up to 360 so add the given measures and subtract it from 360 and that would give you your answer.
The difference between Tucker and Karly's take is that Tucker's solution is analytical while Karly's is graphical. But both are correct either way.
For Tucker's solution, let's say at x=-3 the value for y is 4, and at x=3, the value of y is still 4, then the average rate of change or slope is 0. Note that the slope of the curve is Δy/Δx. Since there is no change for Δy, the slope is zero.
For Karly's solution, even if the curve travels high or low but would have the same elevation of x=-3 and x=3, the average rate of change is still zero. It is actually just same with Tucker's but Karly just verbalizes her solution that was observed visually.
Same as any other midpoint of line segment or two points, it is the average of the two points x and y coordinates...
mp=((x1+x2)/2, (y1+y2)/2)
mp=((-6+16)/2, (-9+5)/2)
mp=(10/2, -4/2)
mp=(5, -2)
Answer:
(x − 5) (x + 4)
Step-by-step explanation:
x² − x − 20
Factor using AC method:
1 × -20 = -20
Factors of -20 that add up to -1: -5 and 4
Divide by 1 and reduce: -5/1 and 4/1
(x − 5) (x + 4)
