With iron tools. farmers were able to clear land more efficentaly
Explanation:
translation = Why are religious and moral norms not coercible?
The relationship between religion and morality has long been hotly debated. Does religion make us more moral? Is it necessary for morality? Do moral inclinations emerge independently of religious intuitions? These debates, which nowadays rumble on in scientific journals as well as in public life, have frequently been marred by a series of conceptual confusions and limitations. Many scientific investigations have failed to decompose “religion” and “morality” into theoretically grounded elements; have adopted parochial conceptions of key concepts—in particular, sanitized conceptions of “prosocial” behavior; and have neglected to consider the complex interplay between cognition and culture. We argue that to make progress, the categories “religion” and “morality” must be fractionated into a set of biologically and psychologically cogent traits, revealing the cognitive foundations that shape and constrain relevant cultural variants. We adopt this fractionating strategy, setting out an encompassing evolutionary framework within which to situate and evaluate relevant evidence. Our goals are twofold: to produce a detailed picture of the current state of the field, and to provide a road map for future research on the relationship between religion and morality.
The answers are:
Reagan won by a landslide.
Republicans gained control of the Senate.
Conservatives called this the “Reagan Revolution.”
Ronald Reagan won the 1980 election by a landslide victory, winning over 50 percent of the vote and 489 of the electoral votes, to Jimmy Carter, his biggest opponent, which captured 41 percent of the votes and only 49 of the electeral votes.
This victory, not only led Reagan to enter The White House, but also made the Democrats lost the Senate for the first time since 1954, and the Republicans won the majority of seats.
Reagan's administration had a big impact in American history, in terms of policies regarding taxes, welfare, the federal judiciary, the Cold War, foreign and domestic affairs, etc. leading some politicians, historians, and conservatives to call it “Reagan Revolution”.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
<u>The greenhouse effect is a natural process that warms the Earth's surface. </u>
Answer:
Listeners can become lost
Explanation:
Informative speakers need to judge their audience before they speak. They need to know some facts about their listeners, where do they come from, from which background socially and ethnically, and they may want to know something about their religion or interests. This way they can judge the level of the audience's knowledge about the subject they will speak upon.
If the informative speakers overestimate the listeners' knowledge on a particular subjects, the listeners will become frustrated because they won't understand what the speakers are telling them. They may consider themselves to stupid or not knowledgeable enough to listen to this speech. After trying to understand, they give up in the end and <em>can become lost</em>, not understanding the speaker and the topic he speaks upon.
