1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IRISSAK [1]
3 years ago
9

What do historians do when using the historical thinking skill of analyzing historical sources?

History
1 answer:
Law Incorporation [45]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Historians use the historical thinking skill of chronological thinking to determine which events could have influenced others later in history. So, in order to determine which events could have influenced others later in history, Historians use the historical thinking skill of chronological thinking.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How does Truman describe the Japanese
mash [69]

He simpily refers to them as the  country of the rising sun.

HOPE THIS HELPS

4 0
3 years ago
Who most likely wrote the accounts of the interaction between Cortes and Moctezuma?
Jobisdone [24]

Answer: La Malinche a Nahua woman from the Mexican Gulf Coast, who played a key role in the Spanish conquest of the Aztec Empire,

Explanation:

A nuhacting as an interpreter, advisor, and intermediary for the Spanish conquistador

7 0
3 years ago
A warning or hint about something happening in the future of a story. A.Alliteration B.Flashback C.Foreshadowing D.Allegory
lisov135 [29]
The answer to your question is c foreshadowing.
<span>The literary device foreshadowing refers to the use of indicative word or phrases and hints that set the stage for a story to unfold and give the reader a hint of something that is going to happen without revealing the story or spoiling the suspense. Foreshadowing is used to suggest an upcoming outcome to the story.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Best pickup line gets brainliest
viktelen [127]

Answer:

Pickup line what is it

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Were knights lower than vassals and held little prestige in medieval society
netineya [11]
Knights were indeed lower than vassals and held less prestige in medieval society. It's not true though, that knights didn't have enough prestige in medieval society. Vassals swore to the king or the ruler of a region, whereas knights often swore to vassals, so they still had people under them, but they were not at the top.
5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are two things that keyed the growth of religion in the 1950s
    8·1 answer
  • In order to suppress the rebellion, what did<br> Britain have to do?
    13·1 answer
  • What are different types of governments are there and what kind of government are we ? What is the leader in each of these gover
    5·2 answers
  • which bronze age technology advancement allowed farmers to grow crops further away from natural water sources
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement is true about the Korean Conflict?
    9·2 answers
  • Did Civil War technology help or hurt soldiers? Why?
    12·1 answer
  • How was the television created?
    12·1 answer
  • From samba and carnival to food, music and religion, African culture is everywhere in Brazil. Which action best explains the Afr
    12·1 answer
  • PLease help
    12·1 answer
  • Which practice of american government is reflected in disexpert
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!