This rebus is supposed to mean “nobody is over the law”, since the word “nobody” is depicted over the word “law”. This reigns true in the government, since the law sets guidelines for all citizens, with no exceptions.
During a criminal trial where Emerly was found guilty, evidence was presented against her which Emerly and her lawyer feel was unfairly prejudicial. ... If an appeals court finds that the evidence against Emerly should have been excluded, she can receive a new trial.
Hope this helps
No according to me the parole system should not be abolished but it should be more strict and done in more specific platforms cases.
Explanation:
According to my opinion, the parole should not be abolished but it should be categorized for some specific cases. The court system needs to define or create a category in which some specific or certain cases fall.
On the basis of nature of case, the court need to grant parole such as in theft cases while in cases like murder, attempt to murder, kidnapping which are more dangerous in nature, should not grant parole.
Thus specification is a required amendment rather than abolishing.
Answer:
the answer is the frist option
Explanation:
plz mark me as a brainest
Answer:
1. Get your undergraduate degree.
2. Take the LSAT (Law School Admission Test)
3. Obtain your Juris Doctor Degree (J.D.)
4. Pass the bar exam.
5. Gain experience in the legal field for 2+ years.
Explanation:
<em>College Degree in Bachelors. at least.</em>
