1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
frutty [35]
3 years ago
7

What crime is committed by anyone (adult) who shall kill a child three years old?

Law
1 answer:
Zigmanuir [339]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Pedicide

Explanation:

<h3>Pedicide means child homicide</h3>

You might be interested in
21. Education promotes all of the following EXCEPT
labwork [276]

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

took the test

7 0
2 years ago
What should officers identify and remove while on patrol?
3241004551 [841]

Answer:

Answer:

Explanation:

florida laws suck

3 0
3 years ago
What is the exception to the 4th Amendment
9966 [12]

Answer: There is no general exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement in national security cases.

Explanation:

Other well-established exceptions to the warrant requirement include consensual searches, certain brief investigatory stops, searches incident to a valid arrest, and seizures of items in plain view.

3 0
3 years ago
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
kolbaska11 [484]

Answer:

I don't know.......................................sry

3 0
2 years ago
Who supports judicial restraint?
balu736 [363]

Judicial restraint is the political theory that says courts shouldn't, unless absolutely required, issue rulings that broaden or alter the character of existing laws.

<h3>Justiciable constraint is exercised by whom?</h3>

A jurist (judge or justice) who upholds a philosophy of restraint can be described as one who considers democracy to have intrinsic, rather than just instrumental, value, that the judiciary is indeed the least powerful of the three branches of government, and who values stability and predictability in the lawmaking process.

<h3>Why do advocates of judicial restraint assert that judges are impervious to public sentiment?</h3>

They are freed from the strain of the outer world of public opinion since they do not have to worry about being reelected. In the end, the majority may not always be correct. The fact that the Founders established appointed judges and elected legislators is not by coincidence.

Learn more about Judicial restraint: brainly.com/question/29545866

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Manpreet reserved a room at the Moonlight Motel. At the last minute, her plans changed making it impossible for her to travel. S
    8·1 answer
  • When dealing with Drug Evidence, which response below is not an appropriate precaution?
    14·1 answer
  • If a juvenile throws a rock at a neighbor is that considered domestic disturbance?​
    15·1 answer
  • Feels like we're on the edge right now
    12·2 answers
  • URGENT 40 POINTS
    15·2 answers
  • What does the meaning of parole have to do with the correction system​
    13·1 answer
  • Not having traffic laws enforced and in place would result in
    13·1 answer
  • Forming rhymes and keywords allows for the learner to use
    5·2 answers
  • John got in a fight and was charged with misdemeanour which type of government would have jurisdiction?
    6·1 answer
  • Does this mean god will still let me in heaven for changing my religion?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!