USA and the UK are two different conglomerate of states in the world. USA, completely known as United States of America has a federal and constitutional republic form of government while the UK (United Kingdom) instills the constitutional monarchy-parliament governance. In this regard, the head of the state along with the representatives are elected into office by the people in the US. They do their roles as government officials under the code of an already set constitution. Conversely, the UK has its monarch who acts as the head of state and absolute power is not vested unto this monarch because there is usually a duly elected separate head of the government that exercises political powers. These leaders, like in the US, uphold a set of laws in the form of a constitution.
Prior to the destruction of the Second Temple, the areas of the world that contained Diaspora communities is the A. Central Asia
<h3>What was Central Asia ?</h3>
Central Asia was one of the regions of the world where Diaspora Communities existed before the second temple was destroyed.
Following the Roman demolition of the Second Temple of Solomon in Jerusalem in 70 CE, the Diaspora is known to have grown. while the Second Temple refers to place for the Jewish traditions that flourished between the return of exiles from Babylon and the rebuilding of the Jerusalem.
Jews eventually dispersed throughout Central Asia and beyond, reaching areas of Europe and North Africa.
Jews spent many years migrating through several Diasporas, visiting numerous nations, before being handed the country of Israel on Arab territory.
Learn more on Diaspore communities here:
brainly.com/question/2205186
#SPJ1
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
The brain is like a office full of info you need to sussced
Answer:
C. State constitutions guaranteed individual liberties.
Explanation:
The 1787 ratification of the Constitution of the United States was one of the major issues of discord between the supporters and opposers of the process. They are known as the Federalists and anti-Federalists.
The main argument of the Anti-federalists was that the federal government will have a massive hold over the people and restrict or minimize individual freedom. They believed that this new Constitution will lead to tyranny and reduce the powers of the state. To them, they wanted the division of power between the national and state governments, for a strong national government will only give more power to the President and individual state powers will lead to oppression. So, their argument was for a state government that will guarantee and allow individual liberties.
Thus, the correct answer is option C.
