Hello there!
Question #1
<span>What was established in the case of Miranda v. Arizona?
One aspect that they truly convened was the fifth amendment which were to require laws that conveyed certain things that would have to be considered and handled properly.
Question #2
</span><span>How does this affect the legal process?
This would affect is because before this, it was quite easier to acquire certain laws, and to easily dishonor them. But ever sense this came about, it was more serious.
Question #3
</span><span> In the case of U.S. v. Nixon, what did the court ultimately decide about the president with regard to rule of law?
They decided that the president does not inform or enforce the final decision. It would have to go into a process,and not a pure law straight abound.
I hope this helps you!</span>
Roman Catholic Church that granted full<span> or </span>partial<span> remission of the punishment of sin. The granting of indulgences was predicated on two beliefs. They basically were taking their money over something not true. </span>
People tried to abide by them and then realized how imperfect we all are, and they realized that we need salvation.
The President is chief of state. This means he is the ceremonial head of the government of the United States, the symbol of all the people of the nation.
