1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dybincka [34]
3 years ago
9

Is it fair that third party candidates take away from the two political parties why or why not

History
2 answers:
mrs_skeptik [129]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

it is fair, third party candidates decide who to vote for so there would be a competition between the Democratic party and the Republican party it is also not fair because even though you can vote for a third party candidate, they cannot win the election so if you vote for a third party candidate, you are basically wasting your vote.

Explanation:

My answer is no, it is not fair and for example, the 2016 election, we had our Democrat: Hillary Clinton and our Republican: Donald Trump, and then we had a third party candidate: which was D88z N8ts funny ig but he was voted by over 9% of people who voted in the election, therefore people wasted their vote on him just to be funny i guess but those votes could have gone to another candidate.

Anna007 [38]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

It is fair

Explanation:

You might be interested in
List three<br> reasons that Loyalists sided<br> with Britain
alexdok [17]

Answer:

Loyalists were American colonists who stayed loyal to the British Crown during the American Revolutionary War, often called Tories, Royalists, or King's Men at the time. They were opposed by the "Patriots", who supported the revolution, and called them "persons inimical to the liberties of America".[1] Prominent Loyalists repeatedly assured the British government that many thousands of them would spring to arms and fight for the crown. The British government acted in expectation of that, especially in the southern campaigns in 1780–81. In practice, the number of Loyalists in military service was far lower than expected since Britain could not effectively protect them except in those areas where Britain had military control. The British were often suspicious of them, not knowing whom they could fully trust in such a conflicted situation; they were often looked down upon.[2] Patriots watched suspected Loyalists very closely and would not tolerate any organized Loyalist opposition. Many outspoken or militarily active Loyalists were forced to flee, especially to their stronghold of New York City. William Franklin, the royal governor of New Jersey and son of Patriot leader Benjamin Franklin, became the leader of the Loyalists after his release from a Patriot prison in 1778. He worked to build Loyalist military units to fight in the war, but the number of volunteers was much fewer than London expected.

When their cause was defeated, about 15 percent of the Loyalists (65,000–70,000 people) fled to other parts of the British Empire, to Britain itself, or to British North America (now Canada). The southern Loyalists moved mostly to Florida, which had remained loyal to the Crown, and to British Caribbean possessions, often bringing along their slaves. Northern Loyalists largely migrated to Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia. They called themselves United Empire Loyalists. Most were compensated with Canadian land or British cash distributed through formal claims procedures. Loyalists who left the US received £3 million[citation needed] or about 37 percent of their losses from the British government. Loyalists who stayed in the US were generally able to retain their property and become American citizens.[3] Historians have estimated that between 15 and 20 percent of the two million whites in the colonies in 1775 were Loyalists (300,000–400,000).[4]

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following describes a state of nature?
xz_007 [3.2K]
B can I get a free cap
5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following most accurately escribes china today
Thepotemich [5.8K]

Answer:

full of corona

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following sentence best describes the Columbian Exchange that occurred during the Age of Discovery? . .
Serggg [28]
Hello!

The Columbian Exchange was a exchange of animals, culture, food and technology, between the old and new world. Letter d).

Hugs!
6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following economists was most opposed to free-market economics?Select the answer that best completes the sentence.
trapecia [35]

John Maynard Keynes is the answer

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What do seals and weights suggest about Harappa and Mohenjo-daro
    14·1 answer
  • What are achievable political consequence to civilizations with one monarch?
    9·1 answer
  • On the tariff issue, ________ supported high protective tariffs; on the money question, ________ sought the inflationary consequ
    15·1 answer
  • Which 3 topics became a major focus of the enlightenment
    13·1 answer
  • What was the first compromise made between house democrats and senate republicans to decide a winner in the election of 1876?
    6·1 answer
  • 3 reasons africa was difficult for europeans to explore.. please help quick it's due in 5 min.. giving brainliest.
    13·2 answers
  • Once the Bill passes BOTH houses of Congress it
    13·1 answer
  • What were the purposes of the "Forward Atlanta"
    10·2 answers
  • A weakness of the Articles of Confederation was that MOST
    5·2 answers
  • Read the passage.
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!