Based on the percentage of readers who own a particular make of the car and the random sample, we can infer that there is sufficient evidence at a 0.02 level to support the executive claim.
<h3>What is the evidence to support the executive's claim?</h3>
The hypothesis is:
Null hypothesis : P = 0.55
Alternate hypothesis : P ≠ 0.55
We then need to find the test statistic:
= (Probability found by marketing executive - Probability from publisher) / √( (Probability from publisher x (1 - Probability from publisher))/ number of people sampled
= (0.46 - 0.55) / √(( 0.55 x ( 1 - 0.55)) / 200
= -2.56
Using this z value as the test statistic, perform a two-tailed test to show:
= P( Z < -2.56) + P(Z > 2.56)
= 0.0052 + 0.0052
= 0.0104
The p-value is 0.0104 which is less than the significance level of 0.02. This means that we reject the null hypothesis.
The Marketing executive was correct.
Find out more on the null and alternate hypothesis at brainly.com/question/25263462
#SPJ1
Answer: 8.05%
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Holdup bank has an issue of prefered stock witha stated dividend of $7 that just sold for $87 per share.
The banks cost of prefered will be:
= Dividend / Stock value
= 7/87
= 0.0805
= 8.05%
The answer in the space provided is 'coming from'. It is because the countries like China and India has government which has less over sight which enables them to transport goods from chemical manufacturers because of their government that are not that strict in terms of transporting goods to other countries compared to others countries that have more over sight and are more strict.
