1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
geniusboy [140]
3 years ago
9

Drawing Conclusions The concept of European nationalism was still in its infancy during the eighteenth century. What could Hapsb

urg monarchs have done to foster a common national sentiment among people of the Austrian empire?
History
1 answer:
Mumz [18]3 years ago
7 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The concept of European nationalism was still in its infancy during the eighteenth century. What the Hapsburg monarchs had done to foster a common national sentiment among the people of the Austrian empire was to create a unity sentiment in the different territories to foster a kind of bond between them and the Austrian monarchy.

The Hapsburg empire constantly grew, as we know the kingdom developed through the years. The monarchy developed effective central administrative states buck what lacked was the sense of identity of the many territories that belonged to the kingdom. That lack of "common bond" did not allow the Hapsburg kings to instill the common culture and traditions in the majority of towns of the kingdom.

You might be interested in
What were the goals of eugenics and sterilization programs in the Third Reich?
kozerog [31]

The Third Reich has a lot of goals but thoos are the biggest:

- Have a world without jewish and catholics

- Have a eugenic program, where the blond haired and blue eyed people will be the masters ( Aryanism )


3 0
3 years ago
100 points!<br><br> What is a physical change?
tatyana61 [14]

A change that does not affect the chemical composition of the object or substance.


Hope this helps!


8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the U.S. use the Atomic Bomb?
Gala2k [10]

Answer:

It was a preferable alternative to a full-scale invasion.

Explanation:

America had two choices: Use the Atom bomb or invade mainland Japan.

Truman decided to use the bomb.

A mainland invasion would have cost the lives of many more innocent people.

4 0
3 years ago
What ideals and principles would you be willing to go to war for?
snow_lady [41]

Answer:

All my rights including freedom of speech

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
25 pts ♥️ ♥️ ill 5/5 thank BRAINLIST and everything
Anastaziya [24]

Answer:

1.People knew where to go.

2.So they went north instead of going the right way

3.They found new land

4.People had maps to say safe

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What are three items from the Populist Party platform that eventually made their way into American life?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true about the expansion of Islam into India? Conversion to Islam was a peaceful transition. Islamic l
    7·2 answers
  • What was the reaction of many Arabs to the creation of Israel?
    10·2 answers
  • Segregation has been harder to overcome in the north than in the south because _______.
    9·1 answer
  • Who ruled through a council of regency?
    10·1 answer
  • What were the pilgrims required to do if they wanted to leave Europe
    14·2 answers
  • What did the government do in the case of New London? How was it going<br> to help the community?
    8·1 answer
  • Which leader made a call for war to all Christendom in Europe?
    11·2 answers
  • During the 1790s, the Naturalization Act changed the process for becoming a US citizen by allowing new immigrants to become citi
    7·2 answers
  • Question 14 of 45
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!