Answer:
116
Step-by-step explanation:
Follow me on ig iam4very
When
, we have


and of course 3 | 6. ("3 divides 6", in case the notation is unfamiliar.)
Suppose this is true for
, that

Now for
, we have

so we know the left side is at least divisible by
by our assumption.
It remains to show that

which is easily done with Fermat's little theorem. It says

where
is prime and
is any integer. Then for any positive integer
,

Furthermore,

which goes all the way down to

So, we find that

QED
Answer:
For the first one: they increase in by 14, so the three could be 73,87,101
Second: Sequential, increasing by 20, next could be 110, 130, 150
Third: Increase by 27, next three could be 122,149,176
Answer:
Step A. 3(m - 2) + 2(m - 2) and 5(m - 2) are equivalent expressions.
Step-by-step explanation:
Step B. If you calculate 3(m - 2) + 2(m - 2) you will see it will equal to 5(m - 2) therefore, they are equal.
Hope I Helped I'm New! :D
Answer:
%8.75 error
Step-by-step explanation:
14.6/n = 16/100
16n = 1460
n = 91.25
100-91.25 = 8.75