Your answer would be 45
X
Radical form for 112 would be 4{7 and then I think you can just search up how to reduce the 4 to 7 i don’t have the symbol btw
Hi there!
We are given the set of ordered pairs below:

1. What is the domain?
- Domain is a set of all x-values in one set of ordered pairs. So what are the x-values that I am talking about? In ordered pairs, we define x and y which both have relation to each others which we can write as (x,y). That's right, the domain is set of all x-values from ordered pairs.
Therefore, we gather only x-values from (x,y). Hence, the domain is {3,2,0,2}. Whoops! Something is not right. As we learn in Set Theory that we don't write the same or repetitive in a set. Hence, <u>t</u><u>h</u><u>e</u><u> </u><u>a</u><u>c</u><u>t</u><u>u</u><u>a</u><u>l</u><u> </u><u>d</u><u>o</u><u>m</u><u>a</u><u>i</u><u>n</u><u> </u><u>i</u><u>s</u><u> </u><u>{</u><u>0</u><u>,</u><u>2</u><u>,</u><u>3</u><u>}</u>
2. What is the range?
- Because domain is set of all x-values. Then what do you think the range is? That's right! The range is <u>s</u><u>e</u><u>t</u><u> </u><u>o</u><u>f</u><u> </u><u>a</u><u>l</u><u>l</u><u> </u><u>y</u><u>-</u><u>v</u><u>a</u><u>l</u><u>u</u><u>e</u><u>s</u><u>.</u> If you got this right before looking up the underlined words then a handclap for you! So how do we find range? Simple, we just do like finding the domain in the Q1, except we gather the y-values in (x,y) instead and make sure that we don't write same number!
Therefore, gather y-values from the ordered pairs. Hence, <u>t</u><u>h</u><u>e</u><u> </u><u>r</u><u>a</u><u>n</u><u>g</u><u>e</u><u> </u><u>i</u><u>s</u><u> </u><u>{</u><u>-</u><u>2</u><u>,</u><u>-</u><u>1</u><u>,</u><u>1</u><u>,</u><u>2</u><u>}</u>
3. Is the relation a function?
- All functions are relations but not all relations are functions. Function is a set of ordered pairs where <u>d</u><u>o</u><u>m</u><u>a</u><u>i</u><u>n</u><u> </u><u>i</u><u>s</u><u> </u><u>n</u><u>o</u><u>t</u><u> </u><u>r</u><u>e</u><u>p</u><u>e</u><u>t</u><u>i</u><u>t</u><u>i</u><u>v</u><u>e</u><u> </u><u>o</u><u>r</u><u> </u><u>i</u><u>n</u><u> </u><u>a</u><u> </u><u>s</u><u>e</u><u>t</u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>t</u><u>h</u><u>e</u><u>r</u><u>e</u><u> </u><u>c</u><u>a</u><u>n</u><u>n</u><u>o</u><u>t</u><u> </u><u>b</u><u>e</u><u> </u><u>m</u><u>o</u><u>r</u><u>e</u><u> </u><u>t</u><u>h</u><u>a</u><u>n</u><u> </u><u>o</u><u>n</u><u>e</u><u> </u><u>s</u><u>a</u><u>m</u><u>e</u><u> </u><u>v</u><u>a</u><u>l</u><u>u</u><u>e</u><u>.</u> Consider the following relation: (1,1),(1,2) - Oh, looks like in a set of ordered pairs, there are two same domains which make it only a relation, and not a function. On the other hand, (1,1),(2,2) - Looking good! No same or repetitive domain, making it indeed a function.
Consider the domain from Q1 and see if there are two same values of x in a set. Looks like the relation is not a function since there are same x-values which are 2 in a set, making it only a relation. Hence, the relation is not a function.
These are all 3 answers along with an explanation. Let me know if you have any doubts regarding Relations and Functions.
<em>F</em><em>r</em><em>o</em><em>m</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>h</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>Q</em><em>1</em><em>'</em><em>s</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>s</em><em>w</em><em>e</em><em>r</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>h</em><em>e</em><em>r</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>r</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>w</em><em>o</em><em> </em><em>b</em><em>o</em><em>l</em><em>d</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>e</em><em>x</em><em>t</em><em>s</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>p</em><em>l</em><em>e</em><em>a</em><em>s</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>c</em><em>h</em><em>o</em><em>o</em><em>s</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>h</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>s</em><em>e</em><em>c</em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em>d</em><em> </em><em>b</em><em>o</em><em>l</em><em>d</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>e</em><em>x</em><em>t</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>o</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>s</em><em>w</em><em>e</em><em>r</em><em> </em><em>(</em><em>t</em><em>h</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>w</em><em>i</em><em>t</em><em>h</em><em> </em><em>u</em><em>n</em><em>d</em><em>e</em><em>r</em><em>l</em><em>i</em><em>n</em><em>e</em><em>)</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>d</em><em> </em><em>n</em><em>o</em><em>t</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>h</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>f</em><em>i</em><em>r</em><em>s</em><em>t</em><em> </em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>(</em><em>t</em><em>h</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>w</em><em>i</em><em>t</em><em>h</em><em> </em><em>s</em><em>a</em><em>m</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>2</em><em>'</em><em>s</em><em>)</em><em>.</em><em> </em>
Good luck on your assignment, have a nice day!
Answer:
can you please give me an example?
i will help you but give me your teacher's example
Step-by-step explanation:
let me know if it's done
Time taken by jerry alone is 10.1 hours
Time taken by callie alone is 8.1 hours
<u>Solution:</u>
Given:- For a certain prospectus Callie can prepare it two hours faster than Terry can
Let the time taken by Terry be "a" hours
So, the time taken by Callie will be (a-2) hours
Hence, the efficiency of Callie and Terry per hour is 
If they work together they can do the entire prospectus in five hours

On cross-multiplication we get,


On cross multiplication ,we get

<em><u>using quadratic formula:-</u></em>



If we take a = 0.9, then while calculating time taken by callie = a - 2 we will end up in negative value
Let us take a = 10.1
So time taken by jerry alone = a = 10.1 hours
Time taken by callie alone = a - 2 = 10.1 - 2 = 8.1 hours