Answer:
True
Explanation:
Scribes were one level below priests in the social pyramid and were well payed and respected.
The answer is: Conspicuous Consumption
Conspicuous consumption is the type of consumption that is not made to fulfill your basic needs to survive, it's made for sophistication or to increase your social status.
Jetting off to a remote destination for dinner is definitely very inefficient if the sole purpose is only to absorb necessary nutrients to your body. Sophistication or social status would most likely become the factors in such dinner activity.
forensic anthropologist Karen burns investigated alleged atrocities in northern Iraq following the 1991 gulf war. she established that one individual was murdered (and not buried by his family) simply through evidence of two polyester threads attached to his legs.
<h3>Who is forensic anthropologist?</h3>
Bones and other hard tissues are the focus of forensic anthropologists' research. They are knowledgeable with uncovering buried remains and methodically recording the facts due to their background in archaeology.
<h3>Who is anthropologist?</h3>
A person who practices anthropology is known as an anthropologist. Anthropology is the study of human characteristics in relation to both historical and contemporary society.
To know more about anthropologist visit: brainly.com/question/27268699
#SPJ4
The behaviorist theory of personality has its foundation in the theories of learning and centers on the effects of environment on one's personal features and activities. In addition, a humanistic perspective of personality was an undeviating response in contradiction of the psychoanalytic and behaviorist viewpoints. Freud supposed that the unconscious mind was the most significant defining issue in a person’s behavior and character.
Answer:
The omnipotence fallacy
Explanation:
The omnipotence paradox or fallacy arise if one assumes that an omnipotent being has no limits and is capable of realizing any outcome or result and even logically contradictory ideas such as creating square circles. This family of fallacies hinges on the understanding of the word "omnipotent" which is the nature of God.
The most well-known version of the omnipotence paradox is the paradox of the stone "Could God create a stone so heavy that even He could not lift it? This phrasing of the omnipotence paradox is vulnerable to objections based on the physical nature of gravity, such as how the weight of an object depends on what the local gravitational field is. Other statements of the paradox that do not involve such difficulties include "If given the axioms of Euclidean geometry, can an omnipotent being create a triangle whose angles do not add up to 180 degrees?" and "Can God create a prison so secure that he cannot escape from it
Relating this to the question, smart think that they are all powerful and they can do whatever they want and will not come to any harm. This is a case of omnipotent fallacy. He feels all powerful.
And believes that because he exercises, smoking (which is dangerous to health) will not cause him any harm, and hence he shouldn't be in the statistics of smokers.
