1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KonstantinChe [14]
3 years ago
6

Which Anasazi cultural practices depended on the environment in which they lived? Explain your reasoning.

Social Studies
1 answer:
Svetradugi [14.3K]3 years ago
3 0
The Anasazi tribe, also known as the Ancestral Pueblo culture, was a prehistoric culture of the Southwest United States. The religion of the Anasazi people was based on their belief of Earth, not only the source of their food and protection, but also as a sacred place connecting them to a Great Spirit. The airy settlement that we explored had been built by the Anasazi, a civilization that arose as early as 1500 B.C. Their descendants are today's Pueblo Indians, such as the Hopi and the Zuni, who live in 20 communities along the Rio Grande, in New Mexico, and in northern Arizona.
You might be interested in
PLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP I BEGGING YOU THIS
marishachu [46]

Answer:

Most of the settled lands of Canada, in Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta, were transferred from First Nations to the Crown (the Government) through treaties.   Today both sides agree that the so-called Indian Treaties are agreements between the Crown (the Government) and First Nations, in which the First Nations exchanged some of their interests in specific areas of their ancestral lands in return for various kinds of payments and promises from Crown officials. However, each side has a different interpretation of what was intended by the agreements. The Canadians (British) and the First Nations were at the same meetings, listened to the same speeches (translated) and signed the same pieces of paper. Yet they had (and still have) two totally different concepts of what the treaties were about, and what each side was promising. The differences in understanding are rooted in two totally different world views, and two totally different concepts of land ownership, and two colliding purposes. The concept of private ownership of land by an individual, who could build a fence and keep others out forever, was totally foreign to First Nations people. First Nations had an oral tradition. They passed down important information by the spoken word during important ceremonies and at celebrations. What was said was what was important to them, not what was written on paper. Though they did not have a written tradition, in the European sense, they recorded important events by sewing beaded wampum belts. Wampum belts signifying treaties became sacred objects that were brought out at certain times, Then elders recited the terms and understandings of the agreement commemorated by that ceremonial wampum belt. The Government View of Treaties The First Nations View of Treaties The British and Canadian governments saw treaties as a way to legalize the ceding of Indian lands to clear the way for European settlement, mining, and railways. Treaties were intended to extinguish all First Nations claims and rights to their land forever, except in those lands set apart as Reserves of land for the bands to live on.   In return, the government would make a one-time payment to the bands, plus a specified annual sum. As well, treaties had terms dealing with hunting and fishing rights, as well as education and health care. Treaties were also intended to offer the Indians some protection from the consequences of new settlement, and some assistance in adapting to new ways of living as the old ways became less feasible. Treaties were also expected to be the first step towards assimilation. Government expected First Nations people to give up their culture, including their customs, their language, their religious beliefs, their ceremonies, and everything else that differentiated them from Canadians of British origin. also Nations saw treaties in a different light. To them, treaties were solemn pacts establishing the future basis of relations between their people, for whom Canada is an ancient homeland, and the new Government of Canada and its people and Nations representatives signed the treaties to ensure that they would receive some government assistance in the future to ensure the survival of their people. They believed (because all the Treaty Commissioners told them so) that they would be cherished and protected by the Crown with whom they had a special relationship.  

Explanation:

Hope this helps :)

7 0
3 years ago
The __________ clause makes the Constitution of the United States, plus all laws and treaties made under the Constitution, super
aliya0001 [1]

Answer:

Supremacy

Explanation:

The supremacy clause makes the Constitution of the United States, and also every laws and treaties made under the Constitution, superior to state law.

7 0
4 years ago
Under certain conditions, the sampling distribution of the sample mean is approximately normally distributed. How do we find the
hichkok12 [17]

Sample is a small set of number (n) represent whole population (N). Mean is the average of sample population (∑n/N). For Standard deviation subtract each number from mean and square it. Then find out the mean of squared differences and take square root of it.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Sample is the randomly chosen small set of number represented by n and it represents whole population (N). Sample mean is the average (n) observation from mean. Standard deviation is used to measure the deviation of data from the mean of the sample.

Sampling distribution provides a mean of statistical inference. Sample size should be large enough to represent the whole. It will be more statistically significant if it is large in size. Standard deviation is the dispersion or deviation  of data set relative to its mean.

3 0
4 years ago
The world is threatened with drought, so people are urged to conserve water. Jack lives far from his neighbors, and no one ever
Anvisha [2.4K]

Answer:

kant rarely cares for the consequences of actions

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What are 6 achievements/accomplishments of Mesopotamia
soldier1979 [14.2K]
Hi here you go
1. mathematics
2. trade
3. astronomy
4.a form of written communication with pictures
5.the invention of  the wheel
6.the concept of time.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Roberto is confident, proud, and self-respecting. He is competent and effective in his job and is loved and admired by his famil
    14·1 answer
  • Which term refers to cultural information about how to use the material resources of the environment to satisfy human needs and
    7·1 answer
  • How many free credit reports are you legally entitled to each year?
    11·2 answers
  • Leah and Matt find out that they are expecting a baby. Matt wants to tell their family and friends right away, but Leah wants to
    13·1 answer
  • Who controlled the land where the songhai empire was located before it was songhai
    6·2 answers
  • Why do geographers call Arabia a “crossroads” location?
    6·1 answer
  • One who studies and writes about history
    5·2 answers
  • Can you help me please??:(​
    7·1 answer
  • How good governance can benefit you?
    9·2 answers
  • Dissociation is thought to be a person's way of dealing with extreme stress by A. experiencing a panic attack. B. focusing and e
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!