Answer: Pseudo listening
Explanation:
Pseudo-listening is a form of non-listening whereby a person appears to be attentive and fully listening in a conversation but actually the person is only partially listening or ignoring the other person speaking. The main reason for pseudo listening is not to listen but to the conversation but to cater to the listener's other personal need. The word "pseudo listening" is made up of the words pseudo which is a Greek word that means "not genuine or real " and listening.[4]
Pseudo-listening is the an ineffective way to communicate. When the conversation has ended, one won't have gotten much of the information said. Since John's mind was somewhere else while Cynthia was talking, John was exhibiting pseudo listening.
A solid is often packed really close to each other and has a definate shape and definate volume while liquid doesn't have a definite shape and volume and takes the shape of it's container, liquid is often far apart from each other and can move freely. Np m8
The area in the world that could be said to have a comparative advantage in oil production is Saudi Arabia
<h3>Who has the comparative advantage in the production?</h3>
If someone can create something for less money than anyone else, they have a comparative advantage. Comparative advantage is different from superiority in a given field.
The ability of an economy to produce a specific good or service at a lower opportunity cost than its trading counterparts is known as comparative advantage. Comparative advantage is a theory that explains why businesses, nations, or people might gain from trade.
Recall that the potential cost of creating commodities was used to define comparative advantage. Saudi Arabia has a comparative edge in oil production because it makes the fewest sacrifices per barrel of oil. Saudi Arabia has a distinct advantage in the oil industry since it can create it in just one hour.
Learn more about comparative advantage from
brainly.com/question/7045530
#SPJ1
Answer:
The Sons of Liberty were a grassroots group of instigators and provocateurs in colonial America who used an extreme form of civil disobedience—threats, and in some cases actual violence—to intimidate loyalists and outrage the British government.
Explanation:
Because they can produce more of it at a more rapid fashion.<span />