1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lina20 [59]
3 years ago
9

Write a sentence contrasting the social development of the North versus the South in the years leading up to the Civil War.

History
1 answer:
Mrac [35]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The northern soil and climate favored smaller farmsteads rather than large plantations. Industry flourished, fueled by more abundant natural resources than in the South, and many large cities were established (New York was the largest city with more than 800,000 inhabitants). By 1860, one quarter of all Northerners lived in urban areas. Between 1800 and 1860, the percentage of laborers working in agricultural pursuits dropped drastically from 70% to only 40%. Slavery had died out, replaced in the cities and factories by immigrant labor from Europe. In fact an overwhelming majority of immigrants, seven out of every eight, settled in the North rather than the South. Transportation was easier in the North, which boasted more than two-thirds of the railroad tracks in the country and the economy was on an upswing.

Explanation:

The fertile soil and warm climate of the South made it ideal for large-scale farms and crops like tobacco and cotton. Because agriculture was so profitable few Southerners saw a need for industrial development. Eighty percent of the labor force worked on the farm. Although two-thirds of Southerners owned no slaves at all, by 1860 the South's "peculiar institution" was inextricably tied to the region's economy and culture. In fact, there were almost as many blacks - but slaves and free - in the South as there were whites (4 million blacks and 5.5 million whites). There were no large cities aside from New Orleans, and most of the ones that did exist were located on rivers and coasts as shipping ports to send agricultural produce to European or Northern destinations.

You might be interested in
Who was one of the leading European explorers of the Pacific world?
Vaselesa [24]

The answer is A. Captain James Cook. He was a famous explorer of the Pacific, known for discovering and charting New Zealand.

8 0
3 years ago
Need help asap right away
MArishka [77]

My best guess is the Rio Grande river because it creates the border between Mexico and Texas.

8 0
4 years ago
ASAP !!! Please Help Me I Have A Lot To Do And History Isn't my best subject. Any Answer will be great .
USPshnik [31]
9 is conneticut hope that helps
7 0
3 years ago
What do the documents reveal about the native americans involved in the conflict at sand creek? how would you assess the militar
Snezhnost [94]

The Sand Creek Massacre took place in 1864 during the American Indian Wars, when Colonel Chivington charged against a village inhabited by native Indians (Cheyenne and Arapaho) and totally destroyed it, killing many people, mostly women and children. Chivington was under the ruling of Evans, the Governor of Colorado land at that time.

The local chief at Sand Creek had visited an American army fort looking for protection for his people, as claims on Indian lands were proliferating quickly and natives were sick of being pushed away all the time towards worse territories. He was told not to worry, as according to a treaty signed in 1851, Sand Creek's land had been legally granted to the Cheyennes.

But the next day he would find out that this was a false promise. A group of soldiers had surrounded Sand Creek. Right before the attack, the Indians had shown an American Flag as a symbol of their desire to keep peace and, trusting on the treaty, they had not prepared any defenses. Chivington ignored the peace intentions and gave orders to his men to kill and slaugther everybody they found in Sand Creek.

Analyzing the preambles, the chief of Sand Creek went to the fort seeking for protection as his people lacked the forces (only children and women were in town) and the military preparation to confront Colonel Chivington men, so he chose to negotiate instead. The Indians showed that their intentions were to avoid any conflict.

On the other hand, Chivington and Evans have gone down in history for comitting the worst massacres against natives. In this case, they violated their own agreement and attacked a town without any defenses. So they is no justification for their murders, in fact, Evans was forced to resign by  President Andrew Johnson in 1865 after having proved his direct involvement with the Sand Creek Massacre.  

5 0
3 years ago
What were Emily Geiger parents names
astraxan [27]
John Geiger and Emily Murff Geiger
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In which city was the contenintal congress held
    15·1 answer
  • What was stated in the Dred Scott decision? Slaves should have the right to sue in the courts. Slaves were the property of their
    7·2 answers
  • In 1979, the National Commission for the protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research developed ethical pr
    5·1 answer
  • An indentured servant brought to Jamestown and other colonies was given freedom once
    14·2 answers
  • Do you think iran will continue to have economic problems ? explain
    6·2 answers
  • How many communist countries are there in the world
    5·1 answer
  • Why was the United States Navy different than the army?
    9·2 answers
  • Who wins the iron throne in the last season in game of thrones​
    12·1 answer
  • What is the name given to products grown on plantations? R_____ M____ ​
    6·1 answer
  • What is causing the problems for Sea Turtles? three reasons why
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!