1 disturb
3 occasionally
4 wisdom
6 confess
7 comfort
8 damp
10 quote
Answer:
<u> Speech about "Public And Private Transport"</u>
Nowadays people from all over the world are suffering from air pollution. One of the reasons for such a situation is the constantly increasing car usage. Are we able to do something in order to encourage people not to use private cars or to use them less? To be honest, there are only several things we can do. Among them is propaganda of the risks caused by private car usage. We can provide people with the main benefits they can get by using public transport and make the transportation prices more affordable.
First of all, advertisement is a very powerful “weapon”. Many people can remember the ad they saw several years ago. Advertisement has a very strong effect. It can impress people, influence their thoughts and even change them. Of course, it is impossible to encourage all people from all over the world to use public transport only. But still, a certain number of people will definitely give up using cars and will give preferences to the public transport as time goes by.
Moreover, we can also provide people with the benefits they can get from the usage of public transport. For example, it is possible to provide those people who use public transport with a 20% discount when they need to buy something. Also, it is possible to implement special cards that will be some kind of an opportunity to change bus to train for free.
As a final point, let’s take a look at one more thing we can provide people with in order to encourage them to use public transport. It would be advisable to make the public transportation prices lower. Let’s suppose that you pay 40$ per month to drive your own car. If you give preference to public transport, it will cost 20$ per month. What would you pick as the method of transportation? Sorry to say that it may be quite hard to set the price of 20$ for public transport, as transportation companies may be against such fee’s reduction. But if it happens one day, a great number of people would give up their cars and prefer public transport in order to prevent congestion and air pollution.
I’m 100% sure that all the ways we’ve mentioned above are still really good methods to encourage people to use public transport instead of private cars.
Explanation:
Answer:
i belive it is D a clause that can stand alone as a sentence
I believe to is your answer.
Hope this helps!
Stay smart,
~{Dunsforhands}
Answer:
Investigative journalism is a form of journalism in which that reporters deeply investigate a single topic of interest, such as serious crimes, political corruption, or corporate wrongdoing. An investigative journalist may spend many months or years researching and preparing a report. Investigative journalism is a primary source of information.
Explanation:
Investigative journalism is a form of journalism in which reporters deeply investigate a single topic of interest, such as serious crimes, political corruption, or corporate wrongdoing. An investigative journalist may spend months or years researching and preparing a report. Practitioners sometimes use the terms "watchdog reporting" or "accountability reporting".
Most investigative journalism has traditionally been conducted by newspapers, wire services, and freelance journalists. With the decline in income through advertising, many traditional news services have struggled to fund investigative journalism, which is time-consuming and therefore expensive. Journalistic investigations are increasingly carried out by news organisations working together, even internationally (as in the case of the Panama Papers and Paradise Papers), or by organisations such as ProPublica, which have not operated previously as news publishers and which rely on the support of the public and benefactors to fund their work.
The growth of media conglomerates in the U.S. since the 1980s has been accompanied by massive cuts in the budgets for investigative journalism. A 2002 study concluded "that investigative journalism has all but disappeared from the nation's commercial airwaves".[1] The empirical evidence for this is consistent with the conflicts of interest between the revenue sources for the media conglomerates and the mythology of an unbiased, dispassionate media: advertisers have reduced their spending with media that reported too many unfavorable details. The major media conglomerates have found ways to retain their audience without the risks of offending advertisers inherent in investigative journalism.
