1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vesnalui [34]
3 years ago
11

Help me please , what is correct?

History
2 answers:
Gre4nikov [31]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The middle one

Explanation:

A large mechanism used for hurling large objects or city walls

Alina [70]3 years ago
3 0
It’s the second one.
You might be interested in
Many people participate in this at 11
Furkat [3]
Your answer is C) A poppy toss, then right after that a moment of silence! 
•❋Korey❋•

6 0
3 years ago
How would the world be different if the Columbian Exchange never happened?
miss Akunina [59]

When Europeans first touched the shores of the Americas, Old World crops such as wheat, barley, rice, and turnips had not traveled west across the Atlantic, and New World crops such as maize, white potatoes, sweet potatoes, and manioc had not traveled east to Europe. In the Americas, there were no horses, cattle, sheep, or goats, all animals of Old World origin. Except for the llama, alpaca, dog, a few fowl, and guinea pig, the New World had no equivalents to the domesticated animals associated with the Old World, nor did it have the pathogens associated with the Old World’s dense populations of humans and such associated creatures as chickens, cattle, black rats, and Aedes egypti mosquitoes. Among these germs were those that carried smallpox, measles, chickenpox, influenza, malaria, and yellow fever.

The Columbian exchange of crops affected both the Old World and the New. Amerindian crops that have crossed oceans—for example, maize to China and the white potato to Ireland—have been stimulants to population growth in the Old World. The latter’s crops and livestock have had much the same effect in the Americas—for example, wheat in Kansas and the Pampa, and beef cattle in Texas and Brazil. The full story of the exchange is many volumes long, so for the sake of brevity and clarity let us focus on a specific region, the eastern third of the United States of America.

As might be expected, the Europeans who settled on the east coast of the United States cultivated crops like wheat and apples, which they had brought with them. European weeds, which the colonists did not cultivate and, in fact, preferred to uproot, also fared well in the New World. John Josselyn, an Englishman and amateur naturalist who visited New England twice in the seventeenth century, left us a list, “Of Such Plants as Have Sprung Up since the English Planted and Kept Cattle in New England,” which included couch grass, dandelion, shepherd’s purse, groundsel, sow thistle, and chickweeds. One of these, a plantain (Plantago major), was named “Englishman’s Foot” by the Amerindians of New England and Virginia who believed that it would grow only where the English “have trodden, and was never known before the English came into this country.” Thus, as they intentionally sowed Old World crop seeds, the European settlers were unintentionally contaminating American fields with weed seed. More importantly, they were stripping and burning forests, exposing the native minor flora to direct sunlight and to the hooves and teeth of Old World livestock. The native flora could not tolerate the stress. The imported weeds could, because they had lived with large numbers of grazing animals for thousands of years.

Cattle and horses were brought ashore in the early 1600s and found hospitable climate and terrain in North America. Horses arrived in Virginia as early as 1620 and in Massachusetts in 1629. Many wandered free with little more evidence of their connection to humanity than collars with a hook at the bottom to catch on fences as they tried to leap over them to get at crops. Fences were not for keeping livestock in, but for keeping livestock out.


5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What reasoning do you think is behind Adam’s reaction
dybincka [34]
Think about which man would agree with

i think
4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is NOT true of human-environment interaction?
Feliz [49]
The Answer is A. I hope this helps you out.
7 0
3 years ago
WHY was leonardo da vinci intrested in studying proportion in nature and human anatomy
Contact [7]
Leonardo da vinci believed that by working with the human body that<span> he was also working with the universe. The human body was used as an analogy in regards to the universe.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The united states and the philippines were at war with each other for how many years at the turn of the 19th century
    10·1 answer
  • Lincoln’s goals for Reconstruction, as discussed in his second inaugural address, were to
    13·2 answers
  • What was a problem antebellum education reformers were
    10·1 answer
  • The doctrine that sovereign power is vested in the people
    13·1 answer
  • Why can be joseph II be considered an Enlightened despot ?
    15·1 answer
  • What role do governments play in preparing for and recovering from a natural disaster such as the Hurricane of 1900? How and why
    11·2 answers
  • Why is the rule of law important to modern democracies
    11·2 answers
  • Write instruction to recharge the mobile phone.
    11·1 answer
  • Anybody know this ?? United States history
    9·1 answer
  • Which group passed the navitation acts
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!