Answer:
The most significant takeaway of this case is the legal precedent that it created for any future case that might use the recorded messages as evidence against a person.
I would argue that the primary difference was the introduction of nuclear weapons after WWII--meaning that the spread of communism could actually take over the world as opposed to just causing unrest in the US.
Answer:
For it and against it
Explanation:
dont really know how to explain it but basically for paragraph one you are writing why you should be for it (in favor of; pro) and for paragraph 2 you are writing why you should be against it (opposed to; con)
hope that helps :)
