James Buchanan was a Democrat not a Whig so (D)
Answer:
Central American and northern Andean Indian, member of any of the aboriginal ... reflect millennia of relative isolation (see South American Indian languages). ... the impact of the Spanish conquest was different in kind as well as in scale, ... and a deliberate policy of reshaping Indian life to conform to European norms.
Explanation:
DescriptionThe Beat Generation was a literary movement started by a group of authors whose work explored and influenced American culture and politics in the post-war era. The bulk of their work was published and popularized throughout the 1950s
I hope this helps :)
He sees that
"The City Council voted this week to make death a meritocracy. ’For all of human existence, death has been a communistic sort of event,’ the Council said in a prepared statement, and that ‘we live in America, where it is not the government’s job to give death to every single citizen.’ The Council noted that from now on, death would be earned through hard work and productivity, not just as a handout for every resource-sucking freeloader on the street. ’If you want to die,’ the Council said, ‘you will have to achieve death yourself. Not everyone gets to die, and that’s just how it will be.’
The vote won by a small margin, with the opposition split between keeping death universal and others pushing for banning death altogether. Listen, Night Vale, I don’t know about you, but I am for this new merit-based system of death. If everyone gets to die, then no one will really value death. I used to be young and idealistic and think that death was a human right, that everyone deserved to die, but now I realize that dying is very hard work. I’m working hard every day, trying to die, but you don’t hear me complaining, ‘Ohh, government, where’s my free death?’ No. When I die, I want to have earned it. I don’t mean to sound insensitive to those less fortunate, who don’t have the means to die without government help, which is why I support our local non-profit shelters, that will help ease our more down-on-their-luck brothers and sisters toward the death they truly want, but just can’t afford."
I believe you are talking about when the US was discussing whether they should have equal representation in the legislative house or unequal representation based on population density. The small states would have been happy with equal representation because that would mean their state interests would not be overruled by larger state populations, such as Virginia (back then, Virginia had a lot of people :P). Larger states would have been more happy with unequal representation based on population density because they thought it was unfair to have smaller states be equally represented when they have more people being represented in the house. IN the end, the compromise was the House of Representatives and the Senate in the legislative branch of the government. The HoR had unequal representation based on population density and the Senate had equal representation from each state.
