270 electoral votes is required.
Answer:
Hunterer-Gatherer
Explanation:
A nomadic human living in a society where most food is found by foraging.
Researchers often use computers in their experiments to keep from influencing the participants and to keep themselves <u>blind</u> regarding the conditions to which the participants have been assigned.
<h3><u>Why is research blinding crucial?</u></h3>
Blinding is crucial to prevent bias (such as observer bias and demand characteristics) and guarantee the internal validity of a study.
Participants may alter their behavior in ways that affect the outcome that researchers are aiming to measure if they are aware of whether they are in a control or treatment group. If those providing the treatment are aware of the participants' assigned groups, they may treat them differently, which could either directly or indirectly affect the outcome.
Learn more about research blinding with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/3453118?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
Answer:
<h3>I think this might help you</h3><h3>
Explanation:</h3><h3 />
<h3>With the flu season swiftly approaching and the H1N1 already affecting large numbers across the world, New Hampshire faces the possibility of a flu epidemic. In such an instance, what action would the state or federal government take? The possibility of a massive quarantine gets thrown around every time a flu epidemic exists, but is such an action an infringement of the rights of individuals living in a free nation? Or is the common good of preventing the spread of infection more important?
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>Even the current health care debate reflects the tension between individual rights and the common good. Over the past months New Hampshire town halls have been crowded with individuals taking a side in the individual rights/common good debate. Some have expressed the view that health care initiatives are in the interest of a healthier state and nation. Others claim that compulsory health insurance impedes individuals’ right to the best health care money can buy. Can the individual rights vs. common good debate help us understand some of the ideological tension behind the current health care discussion?
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>As many of these examples show, this month’s question is largely political, but it can also flow into other areas of thought. There’s the philosophical and moral question of the Donner Party; if you and five others were stranded and starving, and your only hope of getting out alive is to eat the first member who passed away, would you do it to save the rest of the group? There is the question that comes up around the disabled. Do you build special infrastructure to accommodate the few who are disabled even if that meant the cost to do this would jack up prices. Then there is the commercial/environmental side. What is more important, buying a cheaper car that fits your personal budget and your personal tastes or a more expensive and efficient auto that would help save the environment? What do you think?
</h3>
