Answer:
Private citizens, corporations, and foundations already spend billions of dollars each year to support the arts.
Explanation:
The piece of evidence that best supports this claim is "Private citizens, corporations, and foundations already spend billions of dollars each year to support the arts".
Actually, who are the taxpayers? They are private citizens, corporations and foundations. That means if the government is using taxpayers' money to fund arts, indirectly it means that the billions of dollars spent each year to support arts are the monies of the private citizens, corporations and foundations. This then means that these private citizens, foundations and corporations are actually the ones supporting the arts through the taxes they pay.
Yes but what do you mean by online . It can be a sign of a catfish if they dont want to ft . If not then yes a online can be the start of great relationships via: ig, sc, twitter etc
The passage does mention that humans are vain and proud, but it's not the main argument, rather it's used as in introduction to the other idea: that humans did not imagine life outside of earth. So this pride prevented them from imagining life outside of Earth ("beyond its earthly level")
Therefore, the best option is the following one:
<span>Pride kept humans from imagining life beyond Earth.
</span>
No, it isn't. personification is giving human traits to non-humans. Foxes can already stare, but if you said "the fox spoke", that would be an example of personification.
Yousafzai and two other girls
