Answer:
Facial behavior has an innate, unlearned component.
Explanation:
The debate of nature vs. nurture is one of the most important ones in the social sciences. "Nature" states that some traits are innate to humans, and are already within us the moment we are born. On the other hand, "nurture" refers to the idea that it is society that teaches us some of our traits, and we adopt them based on our culture. What this research wants to show is that human facial behaviour has a component that is innate and unlearned.
According to Gerhard Lenski, the growth of the middle class reduces the polarization between the owning and the working class.
In Gerhard Lenski's theory of inequality, he explained that in the society, some people are going to have a surplus of goods in the society. While other people would not be so lucky to have the same.
According to him, social inequality would arise due to the fact that some people are going to have more bargaining power than other people that are in the society.
Read more on brainly.com/question/6782117?referrer=searchResults
it would be false information since that is only an opinion.
Answer:
A) judging, criticizing, and placing blame.
Explanation:
First of all, the social worker is not even considering the possibility that Andrew could have been fired without justification, or that he could get his job back, he is placing blame exclussively on the worker (Andrew).
Besides, he is judging Andrew as an alcoholic, or at least, as a person who has serious problems with alcohol consumption (so serious to the point of going to work drunk and being fired because of that), and finally, the social worker is criticizing the way Andrew is dealing with his possible alcoholism, because he is telling Andrew that he is not even Aware of what alcohol is doing to him.
Answer:
the proper noun is forest and the common noun is hungry
