Answer:
The benefits of a High Speed Rail in California:
- It becomes a feasible alternative to air travel, because it can be either cheaper, or even faster, since passengers do not have to spend as much time on a train station as they do on an airport.
- If demand is high enough, state highways can become less congested, because many people who would otherwise travel by car, would take a high speed train instead.
- Because the trains are electric, they are likely to help reduce pollution.
The cons would be:
- We cannot know for sure how many people would take the high speed trains. Demand could not be high enough to justify the cost.
- The line would be very costly.
- It could end up benefit only a small section of the population who would take the trains, or who travel often.
I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, as can be seen in most countries where high speed lines have been made between large cities. For example, in Spain, the line between Madrid and Barcelona is profitable. The same would likely happen for a line between Los Angeles and San Francisco.
What are the implications of starting a project based on tenuous projections that may or may not come true 10 years from now?
If demand projections are tenous, there is always the possiblity that the high speed line could not be profitable. However, this risk can be lowered if the line is made between highly populated cities.
Could you justify the California high-speed rail project from the perspective of a massive public works initiative?
Yes, a high speed rail would be a project that could massively impact California. The benefits of its operation could outweight the cost.
In other words, what other factors enter into the decision of whether to pursue a high-speed rail project?
As I said before, the most important factor is to construct line between highly populated cities in order to reduce the risk of not having enough demand. It has been demonstrated around the world, in Spain, in Italy, in Japan, in China, that high speed lines that connect very populated regions, can be profitable.
Answer:
<u>Macro-environment:</u>
- Media: The low positioning of the Colorado School framework is getting a great deal of inclusion in predominant press and online life
- GenX: GenX's posterity are starting to enter auxiliary schools. This age requests a tech-rich encounter for it's youngsters
- Monetary Downturn: As the economy eases back, less families can bear to send their children to tuition based school, bringing about expanded government funded school enlistments
<u>Micro-environment:</u>
- Bring your own tech More schools are urging their understudies to cell phones and tablets to class which permits students to discover data online instead of in reading material.
- Finance Department: Financial investigators propose that a 10% cut in costs is vital one year from now to expand Gerfachs return on deals
- Contenders: Gerfach faces expanding rivalry from firms that produce digital books as it were
Answer:
The correct answer is option (b) Little capital
Explanation:
Solution
With a little capital this will help Lily to choose a sole proprietorship organization for her business. a sole proprietorship can begin with a little capital.
The option (a) is not correct as possession of a partner will not lead her to start a sole proprietorship business.
Also the option (c) is not correct the avoidance of personal liability is not the reason because in sole proprietorship, Lily will be liable for her debts.
Answer:
The answer is: Behavior variable
Explanation:
Behavior variable in market segmentation refers to the process of segmenting the market based on consumer buying behavior. Consumer buying behavior consists of consumer usage frequency, consumer habits, benefits sought or expected, user status, brand loyalty, etc.
Answer:
The correct answer is (C) straight variable cost assumptions.
Explanation:
If the total cost increases with small increases in activity, it may be referred to as a step-variable cost.
