Answer:
Vonnegut may have wanted to appeal to readers' interests in prophecies about the future. ... Vonnegut almost certainly wanted to mock the growing emphasis in his day not simply on equality of opportunities (which most people endorse) but equality of outcomes (which many people think is impossible to dictate).
Answer:
The type of irony found in this excerpt is: situational irony.
Explanation:
Situational irony is a literary device consisting of leading the reader to believe a certain event / ending will take place and then unexpectedly changing the outcome.
The author describes Chef Kylie's dishes in detail. Readers get to know that his most acclaimed dishes all consist of meat - lots and lots of meat. With such a description, it is ironic for the author to, all of a sudden, reveal that the chef is actually a vegetarian. Most readers probably do not see it coming at all. Who would expect a vegetarian to used so much meat in their own cooking? Why would a vegetarian cook something they do not eat themselves? Readers are thus shocked by this revelation, and that is where the situational irony lies.
Answer:
It knowing the airmen's fears it enable us to identify on a basic or normal level.
With books that are good, the reader wants to recognize strongly with the characters.
Explanation:
With good books, the reader wants to strongly recognize with the characters, so good writers highlights certain traits they feel will resonate with others.
In Seabiscuit, Hillenbrand made characters strong around the horse who were examples of fears and universal hopes common to most of us.
In the crucible of war, actions are heightened by the see-sawing emotions brought on by death and life experiences.
By understanding the airmen’s fears in greater depth makes us to identify on a very basic level. The airmen are of each on dissimilar but universal in their fears of death and what it means to themselves, their families and comrades.
