-pd - pz = -2z + 59
-pz = -2z + 59 + pd
-pz + 2z = 59 + pd
-z(p - 2) = 59 + pd
-z = 59 + pd over p - 2
z = -59 + pd/p - 2.
Answer:
∠BKM= ∠ABK
Therefore AB ║KM (∵ ∠BKM= ∠ABK and lies between AB and KM and BK is the transversal line)
m∠MBK ≅ m∠BKM (Angles opposite to equal side of ΔBMK are equal)
Step-by-step explanation:
Given: BK is an angle bisector of Δ ABC. and line KM intersect BC such that, BM = MK
TO prove: KM ║AB
Now, As given in figure 1,
In Δ ABC, ∠ABK = ∠KBC (∵ BK is angle bisector)
Now in Δ BMK, ∠MBK = ∠BKM (∵ BM = MK and angles opposite to equal sides of a triangle are equal.)
Now ∵ ∠MBK = ∠BKM
and ∠ABK = ∠KBM
∴ ∠BKM= ∠ABK
Therefore AB ║KM (∵ ∠BKM= ∠ABK and BK is the transversal line)
Hence proved.
X and y =4? is there more information about the question?
A) The question would be "Does cell phone use time correlate to brain cancer?". The population is all cell phone users. The sample is the 469 people with brain cancer, and the 422 healthy people.
B) This sample size may not portray the entire population of users because the positive results may have been fabricated by factors other than cell phone use. You would have to figure out the population size and determine the correct sample size.
C) This study may not portray cell phone use correlation over a large population efficiently because of the sample size and the predetermined conclusion that cell phone use causes cancer.
