Question 1
answer: one inference that can be made is that the narrators mother does not care about Chinese culture involving women’s work. She wants to work regardless.
question 2
answer: “But why shouldn’t i?” she argued. “Lots of peoples mothers work”
hope this helps :)
I think the answer is C) Supporting details, I’m sorry if it’s wrong
Answer: 1.The first part was unnecessary and the second part had words that were redundant
2. The extra words were deleted. There were redundancy issues.
Explanation:
1. The first part was unnecessary, since it was transitional phrases. The second part had words that were redundant. For example, you don't need the re in front of duplicate and with the word again. Or office in government with voting,
2. The extra words were deleted. There were redundancy issues. The motto less is more pertains to this sentence.
Answer:B
Explanation:The Native Americans did not steal the settlers food, rather ... settlement faced several difficulties, according to smiths narratives.
