Answer:
Thomas Hobbes, an English philosopher and scientist, was one of the key figures in the political debates of the Enlightenment period. Despite advocating the idea of absolutism of the sovereign, he developed some of the fundamentals of European liberal thought.
Hobbes was the first modern philosopher to articulate a detailed social contract theory that appeared in his 1651 work Leviathan. In it, Hobbes set out his doctrine of the foundation of states and legitimate governments and creating an objective science of morality.
Hobbes argued that in order to avoid chaos, which he associated with the state of nature, people accede to a social contract and establish a civil society.
One of the most influential tensions in Hobbes’ argument is a relation between the absolute sovereign and the society. According to Hobbes, society is a population beneath a sovereign authority, to whom all individuals in that society cede some rights for the sake of protection. Any power exercised by this authority cannot be resisted because the protector’s sovereign power derives from individuals’ surrendering their own sovereign power for protection.
Hobbes also included a discussion of natural rights in his moral and political philosophy. While he recognized the inalienable rights of the human, he argued that if humans wished to live peacefully, they had to give up most of their natural rights and create moral obligations, in order to establish political and civil society.
Key Terms
Explanation:
Answer:
The Three-Fifths Compromise is an example of sectionalism in American history. The Compromise demonstrates group (white land owners) looking down upon another group (black slaves) as through they are lesser. The Three-Fifths Compromise degrades a whole group of people categorizing them as less than human.
Explanation:
Answer: All processes and measures are in place to protect and value life.
Explanation:
- World War II showed all its destruction. The consequences were catastrophic. Millions of people killed, the creation of all forms of hatred and intolerance, genocide, destroyed infrastructure are some of the results of the most devastating conflict in human history. With the end of the war, international politics changed course and tried to point out the meaninglessness of the war. To this end, specific measures have been taken to protect life, and all the meaninglessness of war has been accentuated. Thus the Declaration of human rights was made in 1948. This document was adopted through joint action at the international level. The Declaration strictly forbids slavery, torture, discrimination, and puts at the forefront the right to liberty, thought, life, protection of privacy, and several measures taken to protect humanity.
- An international organization of the United Nations was created for the same purpose. This organization was formed immediately after the end of the 1945 war. It aims at maintaining global peace, enhancing social and economic development, and protecting the environment, as well as providing assistance to places where populations need help due to war and natural disasters.
- The Nuremberg process is an event in the German city of Nuremberg, where the Nazis were tried. Several of Hitler's high-ranking supporters were on the defendants' bench. Besides, the process aimed to determine the degree of responsibility of the defendants, the method also showed all the evil that Hitler "shone" in Europe. The process is the need to point out sin among humans and to make humanity aware of and resist this phenomenon. The trial was relatively short, and the evidence and testimony were incredibly poignant.
- All of these events are relatively successful. Unfortunately, the wars to this day have not ended. However, an organization such as the UN has repeatedly fulfilled its mission of helping the population. The Declaration of Human Rights lives on, at least in much of Europe, the united states and some other democracies in the world.
Answer:
The members of the Dixiecrats were southern democrats who heavily opposed the ideas of the civil rights movement. They didn't want segregation to be outlawed and were strong supporters of the idea. They even attempted to stall the bill by using a filibuster. The Dixiecrats were not happy with segregation being outlawed and were angered by it.
