The main objectives of Civil Disobedience Movement were as follows: (i) To abolish salt tax and government's monopoly over its production which Gandhiji declared as the most oppressive face of British rule.
The Hellenistic Age was characterized by "advancements in science and culture in the final era of ancient Greece." This is considered to be one of the most spectacular ages in Greek history for its sweeping improvements in the arts and sciences.
Answer: They watched quietly and respectfully.
Explanation: I took the quiz!!
The Mongols distrusted the Confucian scholar-officials in China because they believed these officials would lead China in a way they (Mongols) didn't want.
<h3>How was Genghis Khan compared to Kublai Khan?</h3>
Genghis Khan was more focused on military conquest as he expanded the Mongol empire. Kublai Khan on the other hand, was more focused social and economic facets of his empire.
Square script is a form of writing that involves using block letters. The Mongolians used it to write the Zanabazar square script.
Kamikaze was two typhoons that wrecked the fleets sent by Kublai Khan to invade Japan twice.
Sedentary People are those who don't go around much or engage in much movement. The Mongols went from being nomadic to sedentary.
The Golden Horde was the western Mongol empire and was one of the factions the Mongols split into when Genghis Khan died.
Find out more on the Golden Horde at brainly.com/question/1222831
#SPJ1
Yes,
oligarchy fits as a description of South African government under the system of apartheid. In the
political philosophy of Aristotle, "
aristocracy" is "rule by the excellent ones," and in certain eras of history or in some societies, one group or another has been portrayed as more "excellent" and thus more favorable for serving as governors. In Aristotle's political thought, an
"oligarchy" or "rule by a few" is a corruption of the idea of aristocracy. But Aristotle was biased, believing that by nature some persons are more excellent than others, that some are more suited by nature to be followers, not leaders. (Aristotle used such logic in defending the institution of slavery, for instance.) Today,
we might argue that any sort of "aristocracy" or elitism is always an oligarchy, an arbitrary system in which a few dominate over the many because of factors that can't rationally be defended.For another answer on a similar question, read more on Brainly.com -
brainly.com/question/9475348#readmore
